Volume 23, Issue 68 (3-2023)
jgs 2023, 23(68): 137-148 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sabokkhiz M, Shieh E. (2023). Analyzing the Role of the Concept of Urban Socialization in the Urban Public Space Based on the Status of Human Dignity. jgs. 23(68), : 8 doi:10.52547/jgs.23.68.137
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3527-en.html
URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3527-en.html
1- PhD candidate, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology
2- Professor of urbanism Group, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology, Tehran, Iran, Urbanism Group, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,es_shieh@iust.ac.ir
2- Professor of urbanism Group, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology, Tehran, Iran, Urbanism Group, School of Architecture and Environment Design, Iran University of since and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (8346 Views)
Human dignity is a concept that can have a significant impact on urban public space. In this sense, it speaks of the value of human beings and their status as a thoughtful and spiritual being. Discovering this valuable feeling in an environment that is widely used by citizens is important to the research. The subjective and interactive nature of this phenomenon The purpose of this study was to analyze explicit inductive qualitative content analysis as a research method and to interpret contextual data obtained from in-depth unstructured interviews and field observations, and its perception among various actors and how human dignity was generated. Used. The data were analyzed through a systematic coding process with the aim of classifying concepts up to three levels of abstraction. The selection of participants in this study was purposeful and aimed at developing concepts to reach saturation. The findings of this study indicate that the concept of socialization is one of the most important factors in people's perception of human dignity. It is conceptualized with other concepts such as loss of personal distance, development of social communication, intimacy, social diversity and unity with the environment and society. Is formed. What is of interest is the relationship between these factors and the complexity of their relationships that have led to the formation of a sense of human dignity in individuals. Although the multifaceted concept of human dignity will be able to accommodate the broad concepts and meanings that are involved in this study The concept of socialization of urban public space has been carefully considered.
Article number: 8
Keywords: Human dignity, quality of public space, urban socialization, discovery of mental phenomena, unity with urban environment
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Geography and Urban Planning
References
1. بنتلی، ای ین. (1396). محیط¬های پاسخده. ترجمه مصطفی بهزادفر. انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
2. پوراحمد، احمد. مرادپور، نبی. حاتمی نژاد، حسین. (1396). بررسی تأثیر ابعاد کالبدی - فضایی بر پیاده مداری در شهر تهران، نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی،51(18) : 22-1.
3. دانشپور، سیدعبدالهادی و چرخچیان، مریم. (1386). فضاهای عمومی و عوامل موثر حیات جمعی، باغ نظر،4 : 19-28.
4. جوادي آملي، علی. (1390). فلسفه حقوق بشر، قم: انتشارات اسرا.
5. جیکوبز، جین. (1387). مرگ و زندگی شهرهای بزرگ آمریکایی. ترجمه حمیدرضا پارسی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
6. گل، یان . (1392). شهر انسانی، ترجمه علی غفاری، انتشارات موسسه علم معمار.
7. صدری، آرش. بانکیان، آرزو. رفایی افشار، شادی. (1397). تأثیر پیاده راه بر افزایش تعاملات اجتماعی در فضاهای شهر بجنورد. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 54 (19): 102-81.
8. لینچ، کوین.( 1390). تئوری شکل شهر، ترجمه حسین بحرینی، چاپ پنجم، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
9. مدنی پور، علی.( 1387). فضاهای عمومی و خصوصی شهر، ترجمه فرشاد نوریان، تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه ریزی شهری.
10. محمدپور دهکردی، سیما؛ اکبریان، رضا؛ اعوانی، شهین.( 1388). نسبت میان عقلانیت و کرامت انسانی در فلسفه ملاصدرا و کانت، معرفت فلسفی، 24: 36-11.
11. مطهري، مرتضی.( 1381). فلسفه اخلاق، تهران: انتشارات صدرا.
12. Car, S. et al., (1992), Public Space, Massachusetts: Cambrige university press.
13. Car, S., (1982), Some Criteria for Environment form. In S. Kaplan and R. Kaplan (Eds). Humanscape: Environments for People, Michigan: Ulrichs Books.
14. Carmona M, (1997), Design Policies in Local Plans: Recommendations for Good Practice, Town Planning Review, No. 68, pp. 165-193 [DOI:10.3828/tpr.68.2.k27375u187571462]
15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A, (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [DOI:10.4135/9781452230153]
16. Cao, J. & Kang, J. (2019), Social relationships and patterns of use in urban public spaces in China and the United Kingdom. Cities, No 93,pp 188-196 [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.003]
17. Dines, N & Cattell, V.,( 2006), Public spaces, Social relations and well-being in East London, London: The policy press.
18. Drisko, J. W. Maschi, T, (2016), Content Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001]
19. Efroymson, D. & Thi Kieu Thanh Ha, T. & Thu Ha, Ph, (2009), Public Spaces: How They Humanize Cities, Dhaka: HealthBridge - WBB Trust
20. Gehl, Jan, (2010), Cities for people, London. Island press
21. Hall, E. T, (1982), The hidden Dimension, New York: Anchor books, Cambridge university Press.
22. Hatley, J. H, (2013), Preserving Place: A Grounded Theory of citizen participation in community-based planning, Graduate theses and dissertations, Department of Geography, Environment, and planning, College of Art and Sciences, University of South Florida.
23. Kurniawati, W, (2012), Public Space for Marginal People, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 36, pp. 476 - 484. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.052]
24. Lowson, B, (2001), The language of space, Oxford: Architectural press
25. Lokaitou-Sideris, A. & Banerjee, T., (1998), Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form, California: University of California Press [DOI:10.1525/9780520919327]
26. Lynch, kevin, (1981), A Theory of Good City Form, Mit Press
27. Ramlee, M et al. (2015), Revitalization of urban public spaces: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, No 201, pp.360 - 367. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.187]
28. Salingaaros, N., (2006), A Theory of Architecture, Umbau: Verlag herald Puschel
29. Schwandt, Thomas A, (2007), The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry (3th edition), Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE. [DOI:10.4135/9781412986281] []
30. Zamanifard, H. et al. (2018), Towards a framework of public space governance. Cities, No 78, pp. 155-165. [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.010]
31. Zdravkova, K. (2019), Reconsidering human dignity in the new era. New Ideas in Psychology, No 54, pp. 112-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.004]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)