Volume 12, Issue 43 (3-2021)
jemr 2021, 12(43): 133-175 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rassaf M, Rostamzadeh P, Eslamlueian K, Hadian E. Global Effects of Iran Oil Sanctions:an Application of Games Theory. jemr 2021; 12 (43) :133-175
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2166-en.html
URL: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2166-en.html
1- Shiraz University
2- Shiraz University ,parvizrostamzprvizrostamzadeh@shirazu.ac.ir
2- Shiraz University ,
Abstract: (5889 Views)
After the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the capture of the spy nest, the West, and especially the United States, in addition to pursuing other tools, has also used the tools of sanctions and has implemented many sanctions against Iran. One type of sanctions is oil sanctions, which were imposed to force Iran to join the international community. The US and its allies' embargo on Iranian oil affects the variables of the Iranian and world economies. For this reason, a computable five-zone global trade model (GTAP) is used to calculate the implications of the game tree between the three independent actors of the United States, the European Union, and Iran. The closing of the GTAP model has been changed according to the assumptions used. The results show that the US, Iran and major oil buyers from Iran are damaged by the sanctions. This damage is exacerbated by increasing oil restrictions. With the escalation of sanctions, the European Union is also gaining negative welfare. In the Nash equilibrium, the United States and the European Union will choose weak sanctions, and Iran will try to circumvent the sanctions. Due to the economic costs of oil sanctions against Iran, the lack of full understanding between the United States and Europe, and Iran's efforts to circumvent sanctions, it seems that the United States will not be able to reduce Iran's oil exports to zero.
Keywords: Oil Sanction, EV Welfare Changes, Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), Game Theory, Computable General Equilibrium
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
سایر
Received: 2021/04/3 | Accepted: 2021/07/14 | Published: 2021/09/12
Received: 2021/04/3 | Accepted: 2021/07/14 | Published: 2021/09/12
References
1. Abdoli, G (2019). Game theory and its applications (static and dynamic games with complete information). Tehran, sixth edition, University Jihad Organization Publications. (In Persian)
2. Afesorgbor, S. K (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 11-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.06.002]
3. Al-Kajbaf, H. & Ansarian, M (2012). The Impact of Unilateral and Multilateral Sanctions on
4. Antimiani, A., Costantini, V., Martini, C., Palma, A., & Tommasino, M. C (2012). The GTAP-E: model description and improvements. In The dynamics of environmental and economic systems (pp. 3-24). Springer, Dordrecht. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-5089-0_1]
5. Baghalian,M (2014). The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Employment Level in Iran, Allameh Tabatabai University Master Thesis.
6. Burfisher, M. E (2011). Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carter Barry, E (1988)."International Economic sanction: Improving the haphazard U.S. Legal Regime". Cambridge University Press.
8. Caruso, P (2003). "The impact of International Economic Sanctions on Trade. An Empirical Analysis". Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, vol. 9, no.2. [DOI:10.2202/1554-8597.1061]
9. Dong, Y., & Li, C (2018). Economic sanction games among the US, the EU and Russia: Payoffs and potential effects. Economic Modelling, 73, 117-128. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2018.03.006]
10. Ebadi Mehr, M (2008). Targeted financial sanctions, guidelines for design and implementation. Economic Tadbir Research Institute. (In Persian)
11. Eyler, R (2007). Economic sanctions: international policy and political economy at work. Springer. [DOI:10.1057/9780230610002]
12. Faraji S.D (2012). "Early phase success and long run failure of economic sanctions With an application to Iran" .Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.iss.nl .(In Persian)
13. Felbermayr, G. J., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y (2019). On the effects of sanctions on trade and welfare: New evidence based on structural gravity and a new database.
14. Frank, J (2017). The empirical consequences of trade sanctions for directly and indirectly affected countries (No. 174). FIW Working Paper.
15. Garshasbi, A. & Yousefi Dindarloo, M (2016). Investigating the effects of international sanctions on macroeconomic variables in Iran, Quarterly Journal of Economic Modelling Research, 25, 182-129. (In Persian) [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jemr.7.25.129]
16. http://fna.ir/bm3o02
17. http://fna.ir/bmke17
18. http://fna.ir/bmke17
19. https://www.donya-e-eqtesad.com/fa/tiny/news-3121869
20. Iran from the Perspective of the Right to the Health of Iranian Citizens, Quarterly Journal of
21. Karimi, M.S (2017) Investigating the effect of the existence of a rival country and the possibility of reciprocal action in the outcome of sanctions; A Case Study of Iran Sanctions, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy, (7) 24. (In Persian)
22. Khatami, S. & Shakibaei, A (2017). Analysis of the Evolutionary Game Theory of Iran and Saudi Arabia in the Framework of Genetic Algorithm, Economic Modelling Quarterly, (2) 11, 29-55. (In Persian)
23. Mahdilu, A. Abolhasani, A. Rezaei, M (2018). Classification of types of economic sanctions and estimation of sanctions risk index using fuzzy hierarchical analysis method, Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Theories, (2) 6, 49-76. In Persian)
24. Mahmoudi, A (2015). Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Applied General Equilibrium Model, Islamic Azad University Publishing Organization. (In Persian)
25. Mahmoudi, A (2015). Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Applied General Equilibrium Model, Mahabad, First Edition, Islamic Azad University Publishing House. (In Persian)
26. Malloy, M. P. 1990. "Economic Sanctions and US Trade". Vol. 1. Aspen Publishers.
27. Martin, L.L (1992). Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. New York: Princeton University Press.
28. Marzban, H. & Ustadzad, A (2015). The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Iran's Production and Social Welfare: An Approach to a Stochastic Generalized Growth Pattern. Iranian Economic Research. (63) 20, 37-69. (In Persian)
29. Medical Law, 8 (29). (In Persian)
30. Mirzaee, A. Sahebfuzul, S.M. Allahyaripour, A (2015), Uninvited report eventually a route, Majdoleslam, 1th publication (In Persian).
31. Mohammadi Khabazan, M (2015). The effects of sanctions on Iran's economy, Tarbiat Modares doctoral dissertation. (In Persian)
32. Nakhli, S. R., Rafat, M., Dastjerdi, R. B., & Rafei, M (2021). Oil sanctions and their transmission channels in the Iranian economy: A DSGE model. Resources Policy, 70, 101963. [DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101963]
33. Nazari Adli, N, Khakestary, M (2015) Analysis of Iran's approach in the oil market using cooperative games and review, Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling Research, (21), 194-219.
34. Poor Nejati, M (2012). Evaluating the effects of foreign direct investment on the Iranian economy using a computable general equilibrium model. Doctoral dissertation of Shiraz University. (In Persian)
35. Nguyen, T. T., & Do, M. H. (2021). Impact of economic sanctions and counter-sanctions on the Russian Federation's trade. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 267-278. [DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2021.05.004]
36. Reisman, W. M. R., William Michael, R., & Baker, J. E. (1992). Regulating covert action: practices, contexts, and policies of covert coercion abroad in international and American law. Yale University Press.
37. Rouhani, Z (2002). The underdevelopment of the Third World and the exploitation of the West, Qom, Parsayan Publishing. (In Persian)
38. Whang, T., & Kim, H. J (2015). International signaling and economic sanctions.International Interactions, 41(3), 427-452. [DOI:10.1080/03050629.2015.1024242]
39. www.cbi.ir
40. www.GTAP.org
41. www.irna.ir/news/81923424/
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
