Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Uncertainty

Dr Nasrollah Eftekhari, Dr Sasan Motaghed, Dr Lotfallah Emadali, Dr Hasi Sayyadpour,
Volume 16, Issue 2 (9-2022)
Abstract

In the variability of earthquake hazard analysis results, ground motion prediction equations play an important role. Selection of appropriate prediction relationships for the region can lead to stability and accuracy of earthquake hazard analysis results. In this study, different prediction relationships were investigated and analyzed for earthquake hazard analysis in Ahvaz city. These relationships were ranked based on the criteria of logarithmic probability, Euclidean distance and deviation information in different periods. Then the most efficient relationships were selected by data envelopment analysis (DEA) method on the basis of differences in the obtained results. Out of 67 possible relationships, 5 were identified as suitable relationships for earthquake hazard analysis in the Ahvaz urban area. Then, a special efficiency criterion was used to determine the weight of these relationships. The results of this study can help to reduce to a large extent the uncertainties involved in analyzing the seismic hazard of the area studied.
 

Dr Sasan Motaghed, Dr Marzieh Shamsizadeh, Dr Nasrolla Eftekhari,
Volume 18, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Abstract

In this study, we present the Seismic Hazard Possibility Space (SHPS) for the city of Ahvaz. To achieve this, we applied the intuitionistic fuzzy method to weigh the logic tree used in the hazard analysis and constructed the SHPS based on expert opinions regarding the degrees of membership and non-membership. Hazard disaggregation was performed by through the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, leading to the development of an intuitionistic fuzzy of an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic Tree (IFLT). The SHPS includes both the degree of membership and non-membership for pathways contributing to hazard generation. The SHPS illustrates the acceptance, non-acceptance, and ambiguity associated with potential hazard values from an expert perspective, thus assisting analysts in selecting appropriate hazard values. According to the numerical results of our analysis in the Ahvaz region, the seismic hazard is located in an uncertainty (unacceptability) zone, indicating that experts have low confidence in the results of the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for Ahvaz. In addition, the hazard is characterized by an "unconfident zone". This finding indicates that experts are fairly confident in the results of the analysis for Ahvaz. This finding implies that the models and parameters used in the PSHA for this region are not accepted by experts, and further efforts are needed to identify or develop appropriate models and accurate parameters specific to the area. In conclusion, this research demonstrates how intuitionistic fuzzy sets can be used to construct SHPS, providing a novel framework for quantifying uncertainty and expert opinion in hazard assessment.

Prof Seyyed Mahmoud Fatemi Aghda, Dr Asieh Hamidi, Ms Fatemeh Amiri,
Volume 19, Issue 5 (12-2025)
Abstract

The evaluation of mechanical strength, particularly the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks, plays a critical role in the design and performance prediction of surface and underground structures, significantly impacting project costs and safety in engineering applications. Traditional laboratory testing methods for UCS assessment are destructive, time-consuming, and expensive, while indirect methods often lack reliability due to rock heterogeneity. This study addresses these limitations by developing advanced machine learning frameworks that integrate petrographic features with conventional rock properties to predict UCS and quantify associated uncertainties. The research utilized a comprehensive dataset from sedimentary rocks collected along Iran's southern coastlines (Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman), encompassing mechanical properties (UCS, Brazilian tensile strength, point load index, porosity, ultrasonic pulse velocity), durability indices (Los Angeles abrasion, slake durability, aggregate impact value), and detailed petrographic characteristics derived from thin-section analysis. Three complementary approaches were implemented: (1) hybrid Neural Network-Gradient Boosting regression (ANN-GBR), (2) AutoML-optimized Random Forest, and (3) Monte Carlo simulation-based uncertainty quantification. Key petrographic features including immature and mature clastic textures, the mineral composition (quartz, chert) were used as input parameters alongside alongside  laboratory testing to improve the prediction of UCS.The influence of these petrographic features on the rock’s microstructure and microcrack propagation contributes to reducing model uncertainty and enhances the reliability of predictions in complex and heterogeneous rock conditions. The AutoML-optimized Random Forest model demonstrated exceptional predictive performance with R² = 0.9884, RMSE = 0.5732 MPa, and MAPE = 3.6%, significantly outperforming traditional empirical methods. The ANN-GBR hybrid approach achieved R² = 0.9412 with RMSE = 1.385 MPa, while Monte Carlo simulations provided robust probabilistic assessments through 95% confidence intervals and systematic bias identification. Feature importance analysis revealed that soundness parameters and mineralogical composition are the most influentialpredictors, emphasizing the critical role of micro-scale petrographic properties in determining macroscopic mechanical  behavior.  
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Engineering Geology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb