Search published articles


Showing 14 results for Bearing Capacity


Volume 3, Issue 1 (11-2009)
Abstract

(Paper pages 523-542) This paper presents a rigid circular footing model with specified properties and dimensions on a sandy-clay soil with Mohr-Coulomb material. This model is analyzed dynamically with finite difference 2D FLAC software under vertical component of ground excitations. Then the soil is improved with cement grouting and analyzed again. Consequently, the load-settlement curves under a circular footing, due to vertical component of ground accelerations through the underlying soil, are plotted. Also the dynamic bearing capacity of natural and soil cemented foundation is presented and discussed. The analysis results show that adding 2, 4 and 6 percent of cement, with certain conditions, cause 2.7, 4.2 and 7.0 times increase in dynamic bearing capacity, respectively, in comparison to normal soil.
Ali Attarzadeh, Ali Ghanbari, Amir Hamidi,
Volume 9, Issue 1 (6-2015)
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the bearing capacity of strip foundations next to sand slope. A series of laboratory model tests has been carried out and a new correlation coefficient to estimate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes is presented. The sand layers were prepared in a steel test tank with inside dimensions 500 ´ 200´ 250 mm. After vertical loading, the applied load and displacement of foundation were recorded and stress-settlement curve is drawn. Finally, the load at which the shear failure of the soil occurs is recorded as ultimate bearing capacity of foundation. The test sand used in this study was Babolsar sand with relative density of 50%. The relative performance of different distance of foundation from the edge of slope and inclination angle of slope are compared using same quantity of soil properties in each test. The results indicate that with increasing distance from the edge of the slope, bearing capacity increases linearly. Also with increasing slope angle, the bearing capacity has declined linearly
Amin Keshavarz, Mehdi Nemati,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (2-2017)
Abstract

In this paper, the bearing capacity of strip footings on fiber reinforced granular soil has been studied. The stress characteristics or slip line method has been used for the analysis. In the selected failure criterion, the orientation of the fibers are isotropic and fibers are not ruptured. Seismic effects have been considered in the equilibrium equations as the horizontal and vertical pseudo-static coefficients. The equilibrium equations have been solved using the finite difference method. The provided computer code can solve the stress characteristics network and calculate the bearing capacity. The bearing capacity has been presented as the bearing capacity factors due to the unit weight of the soil and surcharge. Several graphs have been prepared for the practical purposes. Also, a closed form solution has been presented for the bearing capacity factor due to the surcharge. By the parametric studies, the effects of the geometry and soil properties have been investigated. Results show that the bearing capacity increases with an increase on the average concentration and aspect ratio of the fibers, the fiber/matrix friction angle and the soil friction angle. Furthermore, the extent of the failure zone is increased with increasing the pseudo-static coefficients and decreasing the surcharge.


Mehdi Jalili, Amin Zare, Mohammad Javad Shabani,
Volume 12, Issue 4 (12-2018)
Abstract

Introduction
The design engineers usually follow a specific decision-making process for optimal selection of the type of required foundation and its design. In this state, in case the surface foundation is not appropriate for the project conditions, before making any decisions about the use of deep foundations, the proper methods for optimization of the liquefied soil should be evaluated in order to compare the advantages and disadvantages of each of them with those of deep foundation, in terms of efficiency, implementation problems, costs, and finally to select the best choice. One of the best methods of soil improvement is the use of stone columns. The rationale behind the use of stone columns is the high shear strength of materials and the provision of lateral grip by surrounding soil. Therefore, the stone column can receive the load from the structure, and transfer it to the resistant layers. In the soils with low shear resistance, the lateral constraint crated by the surrounding soils is not enough for preventing the sideway buckling of the column under which is subjected to the loads. Thus, special measures should be considered for the use of stone columns in these soils. One of these methods is the use of reinforcement shelves such as geogrid and geotextile. Investigating the previous studies, the lack of evaluation of the design parameters such as the settlement ratio of the soil improved by the reinforced stone column to the geogrid, and provision of design graphs in this regard, has been revealed. Therefore, by extension of the studies conducted by Chub Basti et al. in 2011, the design graphs were provided in this regard.
Material and methods
The PLAXIS V8 Software was used for modelling the soft soil improved by the stone column. For increasing the precision of the results, the 15-knot element was used in the current study. The fine mesh was used in the models made for the analysis of the problem. For simulation of the improved soft soil with the stone column in a single cell, the modelling was implemented in a two-dimensional environment in axial symmetry conditions. In the current study, it was assumed the rigid foundation is on the improved bed. Thus, for analysis of the simulated model, a vertical strain up to 2% of the soft soil height has been applied on the ground. Also, for simulation of the soil behavior, an appropriate model of soil and parameters proportional to the materials should be allocated to the construct geometry. The non-linear stress-strain of the soil in different levels of the problem can be simulated. The number of model parameters increases with the level of problem rupture. For precise simulation, we need the proper parameters of the materials. For modeling of soft soils and stone columns, elastic-plastic model with Mohr-Coulomb rupture criterion was used. In the current study, it was assumed the soft bed is located on a very hard layer of soil. Therefore, the vertical deformation was prevented on this horizontal boundary. Also, the horizontal deformation in two vertical edges was prevented and only deformation in vertical direction was allowed. The soft bed close to saturation was considered without the determined free water level. For models with stone columns, the element of interface between the stone column and soft soil, has been used. The reason behind using this element is that the stone column rupture is of shear form and due to this, a significant shear stress is created on the common surface between the stone column and soft soil. The percentage of the replacement area is defined as the ratio of the total area of the stone columns to the total area of the non-improved area. In the current study, the percentage of the replacement area is utilized between 10 to 30%, which is used in implementation. Also, the diameter of the stone columns is from 0.6 to 1.2, in the analyses.
Results and discussion
The results of the numerical study were compared with the existing theoretical relationships provided by Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997), and Pulko et al. (2011). Figure 1 shows the comparison of the replacement percentage (RP) and settlement ratio (SR) in the non-reinforced state in the current study as well as theoretical relationships proposed by the previous researchers. Based on this figure, there is a difference between the results of the current study and those of Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997), and Pulko et al (2011). Poorooshasb and Meyerhof (1997) calculated the settlement ratio in their proposed material with the assumption of linear elasticity of the materials without consideration for plastic settlement. Therefore, the settlement of the improved soft soil with stone column, calculated by Poorooshasb and Meyerhof, would not show the real amount. However, Pulko et al. (2011), with consideration for the elastoplastic behavior of the materials, the lateral expansion of the stone column, and the primary stress of the soil around the column, provided more realistic results that correspond closely with the present study. Also, for designing the stone column, the results of its reinforcement have been also provided in the graph presented in Figure 2. Thus, by the use of these graphs, the ratio of settlement reduction can be obtained for each distance between columns and with different percentages of alternatives../files/site1/files/124/2jalili%DA%86%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%87.pdf
Majid Jazebi, Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi,
Volume 12, Issue 5 (12-2018)
Abstract

This study numerically investigates the bearing capacity of drilled shafts (bored piles) in clay using FLAC2D. The results obtained in this study are compared with centrifuge test results. The results of the empirical relationships available in the literature are compared with the results of the present numerical study. A series of analyses is also conducted to assess the effects of various soil and pile parameters on the magnitude of tip and side resistance of bored piles embedded in clay. These parameters include the soil elastic modulus, pile length and diameter, undrained shear strength, unit weight, and Poisson’s ratio of soil. Furthermore, the coupling effect of soil undrained shear strength and elastic modulus of soil on tip resistance are investigated. The results show that the lower value of soil elastic modulus results to lower effect of soil undrained shear strength. The effect of soil undrained shear strength on tip resistance is approximately constant (about 83% for a change of soil undrained shear strength between 25 to 200 kPa) for the range of elastic modulus between 20 and 180 MPa. Also, a new equation is proposed to estimate the bearing capacity factor of N*c.
 
, , , ,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (8-2019)
Abstract

Introduction
Retaining walls are geotechnical structures built to resist the driving and resistant lateral pressure. In terms of serviceability life, these walls are divided into two groups including short-term structures (temporary), such as urban excavation project, and long-term (permanent) structures, such as Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls (MSE Walls). Retaining walls are implemented by two main methods including Top-down and Bottom-up. Among the reinforcements applied in the Bottom-up walls, one can name geocells, geogrids, metal strips, and plate anchors. On the other hand, the common reinforcements applied in the Top-down walls are grouted soil nails and anchors and helical (screw) soil nails and anchors.
Plate anchors are burial mechanical reinforcements that have one or multiple bearing plates with a bar or cable to transfer the load to an area with stable soil. Among different types of plate anchor applied in onshore and offshore projects, one can name simple horizontal, inclined, and vertical plate anchors, deadman anchors, multi-plate anchors, cross-plate anchors, expanding pole key anchors, helical anchors, drag embedment anchors, vertically loaded anchors (VLAs), suction-embedded plate anchors (SEPLAs), dynamically-embedded plate anchors (DEPLAs) like Omni-max and torpedo anchors, and duckbill, manta ray and stingray anchors.
The present research reports the results from physical modeling of plate anchor retaining walls under static loading. The evaluation parameters in this work include the geometry, dimension, and reinforcement configuration of plate anchors on wall stability. PIV technique was employed to observe critical slip surface. It is worth mentioning that PIV is an image processing technique firstly used in the field of fluid mechanics to observe the flow path of gas and fluid particles. This method was used in geotechnical modeling by White et al. (2003) and few reports are already available about its application to observe wedge failure of mechanically stabilized retaining walls.
Material and methods
To carry out tests at a laboratory scale, a dimensionality reduction ratio of 1/10 was applied. Thus, all dimensions of the designed retaining wall were divided by 10. As a result, a retaining wall with a height and length of 3000 mm was reduced to a wall with 300×300 mm2 dimensions. To build a retaining wall, a chamber was designed with a length, width, and depth of 1000 mm, 300 mm, and 600 mm, respectively.
The soil used in all tests was the sandy soil supplied from Sufian (in Eastern Azerbaijan, Iran). According to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), the soil is classified as poorly graded sand with letter symbol ‘SP’.
To create a perfect planar strain condition and prevent any friction between the footing and the lateral sides of the test box, the footing length was selected 1 mm smaller than the 300 mm width of the test chamber. Therefore, the length, width, and thickness of footing were selected as 299, 70, and 30 mm, respectively.
The length and diameter of applied tie rods were respectively 300 mm and 4 mm, which are the smaller scales of 3000 mm length and 40 mm diameter tie rod. The two sides of the tie rods were threaded to plate anchors and wall facing. Four polished square and circular anchor plates with two different areas were used. The area of small and medium circulars are respectively equivalent to the area of small and medium square plates.
Because no post-tensioning occurs in these plate anchors, the horizontal and vertical distances were both selected as 1500 mm. By applying a dimensionality reduction coefficient of 1/10, a 150 mm center-to-center distance was obtained for reinforcements in the wall. Accordingly, three applied reinforcement configurations including 5-anchor, diamond, and square configurations were used.
To construct permanent retaining wall facing, prefabricated or precast concrete blocks with a thickness of 300 mm were used. Wood (2003) conducted a dimensional analysis and introduced four types of material with different thicknesses for a 300 mm concrete facing in laboratory modeling. Accordingly, a 0.9 mm thick aluminum plate was used in the experiments performed in the present work.
Results and discussion
With an increase in dimensions of anchor plates, an increase in bearing capacity of footing and a decrease in horizontal displacement of the wall are noticed. By comparing the 24 mm footing settlement in three configurations, with changing dimension of the plates from C1 to C2 and S1 to S2 respectively, 63% increases are observed in bearing capacity of the wall.
An increase in anchor plate dimensions results in a significant decrease in wall displacement. Therefore, changing the plates from C1 to C2, S1 to S2 leads to 24% and 28% declination in wall displacement.
By changing reinforcement configuration from square to diamond, diamond to 5-anchore, and square to 5-anchor, respectively, 27%, 31%, and 67.5% increases in bearing capacity for small plates, 9.2%, 27%, and 38% for medium plates are achieved using a comparison of the final loading steps in experiments. An analogy of percentages shows that a decrease in the effect of changing the reinforcement configurations on the bearing capacity of the wall with an increase in plate anchors dimensions is reached. 
Conclusion
In the present research, a set of laboratory experiments were carried out to evaluate the stability of mechanical retaining walls reinforced with plate anchors with different geometries (square and circular), sizes (small and medium), and configurations (diamond, square, and 5-anchor). The main results of the present work can be outlined as follows:
• The maximum bearing capacity is for the 5-anchor configuration since it has one more reinforcement. After 5-anchor configuration, the diamond configuration results in a higher bearing capacity compared to the square configuration.
• Circular anchor plates compared to square anchor plates provide a higher wall stability and in the most of the experiments lead to higher bearing and lower displacement in the wall.
• Wall displacement in a diamond configuration with one less reinforcement shows a little difference with 5-anchor configuration. The maximum wall displacement occurs in a square configuration and more wall swelling is observed in the wall middle height due to inefficient anchors configuration in the wall.
./files/site1/files/132/2Extended_Abstracts.pdf
Erfan Naderi, Adel Asakereh, Masoud Dehghani,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (8-2019)
Abstract

Introduction
Bearing capacity is very important in geotechnical engineering, which depends on factors such as footing shape, stress distribution under footing and failure mechanism of soil. Construction of the footing near a slope affects the behavior of footing and reduces the bearing capacity. Also, construction of structures on soft soil usually involves problems such as excessive settlement, deformation and stability problems. In order to increase the bearing capacity, especially in soft soils, one method is adding stone columns to soils. In this method 15 to 35 percent of unsuitable soil volume is replaced with appropriate material. In this research, the bearing capacity and settlement of a strip footing on a clayey slope reinforced with stone columns is investigated. For this purpose, a series of small-scale model tests was performed on the slope reinforced with both types of ordinary and vertical encased stone columns. The effects of length of stone column and location of stone column on the behavior of footing was studied and the optimum length of column and best location for column were determined. Also, some tests were performed on the effect of group stone columns on the footing and the efficiency of columns was investigated.
Material and methods
In order to determine properties of clay soil, stone column and encasement material, some preliminary standard tests were performed. The stone column material was selected with aggregate size ranging from 2-10 mm considering the scale effect. The performance of stone column depends on the lateral confinement provided from the surrounding soil and this lateral confinement represents undrained shear strength of the soil. In very soft soils (cu<15 kPa), the lateral confinement is not adequate and the stone column cannot perform well in carrying the required bearing capacity. For this reason, a series of undrained shear strength standard tests were carried out on clay samples with different water contents. According to these tests, the amount of water content of clay related to cu-15kPa was equal to 25%; while the natural water content of the clay was 4%. Therefore, the additional amount of water was weighted and added to clay. The apparatus of this research was consisted of two main parts including a test box and a hydraulic loading system. The test box dimensions should be such that for all states of the tests, the stress in the soil applied from the loading would be almost zero at all boundaries of the box. Thus, a box was built to accommodate the clay slope with 150 cm×120 cm×30 cm dimensions. The test box was built using steel material and steel belts were welded around it to prevent the deformation at high loads. The front side of the box was made from two pieces of tempered glass and a 10 cm×10 cm grid was drawn on them, for making the slope during construction and observation of deformations during the loading easier. The model strip footing dimensions were 29 cm length, 10cm width and 4cm height and it was made from steel to have no deformation during the loading. The displacement of the footing was measured using two dial gauges with accuracy of 0.01 mm.
The clay was filled in the test box in 5 cm thick layers and compacted with a special 6.8 kg weight tamper. All model stone columns were constructed using the replacement method. In this method, a 10 cm diameter open ended steel pipe was inserted into the soil and the clay within the pipe was excavated. Then the stone column material charged into the hole in 5 cm layers and each layer was compacted using a 2.7 kg special circular steel tamper with 10 blows. The 5cm compactions were repeated until the construction of ordinary stone column was completed. For construction of vertical encased stone columns, the cylindrical encasement mesh should be constructed first. Then, after excavating the hole, the prepared encasement mesh was placed inside the hole and the aggregates were charged into the hole in 5 cm layers and compacted.
Results and discussion
The loading method used in all tests was a stress control method. Bearing capacity values were determined from pressure-displacement diagrams using tangent method. All test results show that when any type of stone columns was added to slope, the bearing capacity of adjacent footing was increased. Vertical encasing of stone columns leads to a further improvement in the behavior of the footing. Influence of length of ordinary stone columns on the behavior of strip footing near clayey slope, was studied for four different lengths. Results show that, the optimum length of stone columns giving the maximum performance is about 4 times their diameter. Also, the location of column for both ordinary and vertical encased stone columns was studied using a series of laboratory tests and results show that the best location for the stone column is right beneath the footing. Also, group stone column tests resulted that for both ordinary and vertical encased types of stone columns, the group of two columns had a better efficiency than the group of three columns.
Conclusion
In this investigation, some model tests with 1/10 model scale on a strip footing near a clayey slope reinforced with stone columns were performed and the effects of different parameters such as stone column length and location were studied. Based on results from experiments on different states of stone columns, the following concluding remarks may be mentioned:
- The maximum encasement influence was observed when the encased stone column is placed under the footing.
- The optimum length of ordinary stone columns which are placed beneath the strip footing gives the maximum performance more than 4 times to their diameter.
-Bulging failure mode governs when the stone column is placed under the footing. When stone column is not beneath the footing, the failure mode was lateral deformation.
- Comparing the different locations of stone columns in the slope shows that for both ordinary and vertical encased stone columns, the best location having the most influence on the strip footing is under the footing and with increasing the spacing between column and footing, the bearing capacity is reduced.
./files/site1/files/132/7Extended_Abstracts.pdf
Mohammad Mahdi Aminpour1, Mohammad Maleki,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (5-2020)
Abstract

Introduction
Studying the effect of slope angle on bearing capacity of foundations on the slope in urban areas is a challenging problem that has been investigated by researchers for years. In general, the analytical approaches for solving this problem can be categorized into limit equilibrium, characteristics and limit analysis methods. In recent years, there have been studies for using the limit analysis within the framework of finite element method for geomaterials. In these studies, the soil mass is not considered as rigid and there is no need to predefine a failure surface for the slope. In the performed research, using the upper bound finite element limit analysis, bearing capacity of strip foundation on slope have been studied. This analytical method enables the use of the advantages of both methods of limit analysis and finite element analysis. In this method, the slip between the two elements is considered. In order to find the critical state of the failure, the rate of power internally dissipated is linearly optimized, by using the interior points method. The advantages of this method are the high convergence rate in comparison with other analytical optimization methods. The effect of different upstream and downstream slopes and foundation depths and also the influence of various mesh discretizations have been evaluated. Finally, the results are compared with those obtained from previous methods available in the literature.
Methods
The finite element limit analysis method is based on nodal velocities. Considering the principals of the finite element method and having the nodal velocities, the velocity at each node of the element can be obtained from corresponding shape functions. The rate of power internally dissipated in each element is defined by multiplying the strain rate on stress in each element. In this method, the slip between the two elements and the rate of internal power dissipated at each discontinuity of two adjacent elements is considered. For this purpose, in each node, four new unknowns’ velocities are defined. To remove the stress from the equations, and provide a linear relationship for linear optimization, a linear approximation to the yield function has been used. For this purpose, the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion is estimated with a polygon in the stress space. Also, using the reduced strength parameter, the effect of the dilation angle is considered. According to the principles of upper bound limit analysis, the value of plastic strain rate is calculated from the flow rule. The velocity field in elements and discontinuities must satisfy the set of constraints imposed by an associated flow rule. In order to have an acceptable kinematics field, the velocity vectors have to satisfy the boundary conditions. These conditions include zero kinematics velocities along the vertical and horizontal boundaries of the geometry as well as negative vertical unit velocities and zero horizontal velocities at points underneath the rigid foundation.
Results and discussion
In order to calculate the bearing capacity of foundation, a set of different uniform and non-uniform mesh has been examined. The results obtained from different uniform mesh sizes indicate a certain divergence in the course of analysis. However, the results between the fine and very fine non-uniform mesh are closely related to each other and are converged. The obtained results show that, by increasing the internal friction angle, the bearing capacity has been increased. At high angles of modified friction, the effect of increasing the internal friction angle on the increase in bearing capacity is more in slopes with lower angles. By increasing the downstream foundation depth, the bearing capacity has been increased. This increase is more important in the case of slopes with lower angles. However, the upstream depth variations didn't present a significant effete on bearing capacity. In order to investigate the effect of upstream angle on the bearing capacity, the upstream mesh is also refined similar to the downstream. The obtained results indicate that variations of the upstream angle have a minor effect on the bearing capacity. This is of course true if the upstream slope is fully stable. The results of the proposed method in this study are an upper bound for the results reported by the limit equilibrium and displacement finite element methods. As seen in Figure 1, the suggested method predicts lower bearing capacities compared to rigid block limit analysis method and is indeed a lower bound for the classical limit analysis method. The finite element limit analysis with linear optimization has resulted in more bearing capacity than cone optimization. The bearing capacities, obtained from characteristic lines method depending to the slope angles, in some cases is more and in some cases less than those explored by the proposed method.
In this paper, the bearing capacity of foundation located on slope was evaluated by finite element limit analysis method. In this regard, the effects of different downstream and upstream angles of slope and foundation depths and also, the effect of various mesh discretizations on the bearing capacity were studied. It is shown that an increase in the downstream angle causes a decrease in the bearing capacity and an increase in the downstream foundation depth leads to an increase in the bearing capacity.  However, the upstream angle and upstream foundation depth were not much effective on the bearing capacity.
 
Semaneh Ghasemvash, Rouzbeh Dabir,
Volume 14, Issue 3 (11-2020)
Abstract

Introduction
Pavement layers as a part of road structure play an important role and provide a flat and secure surface. Subgrade layer could act as a compacted embankment, natural or stabilized ground. Subgrade is a foundation of pavement layers, and it withstands all of loads due to vehicles that are transferred from upper layers (i.e., subbase, base and asphalt layers).Therefore, constructing pavements with bearing capability, high durability, quality, and maintenance in proper operating conditions is very important. However, suitable materials for constructing pavement layers are not available, and improvement techniques should be employed for them. Generally, different methods such as mechanical or chemical are available for improvement. Nowadays, geosynthetic materials such as geotextile and geogrid are used to optimize and enhance the bearing capacity of pavement layers. The present study is aimed to investigate the effects of geotextile applications on bearing capacity of clay-gravel mixtures in pavement layers.
Material and Methods
In this research, materials were prepared from Barandouz area. Clayey soil was mixed with gravel in 25, 50 and 75 percentages (by weight). Geotextile was woven and made of polypropylene (with commercial name Fibertex-F-32). Geotextile effects in mixture were evaluated in two conditions. Position number one indicates the arrangement of geotextile.  This means, at first, one geotextile layer was embedded in the middle of materials. Then, two and three geotextile layers in equal depths from each other were used in soil mixtures. Position number two shows the mixing pieces randomly. This means that geotextile pieces in 1×1 and 5×5 cm2 were prepared and were randomly mixed with materials in 1, 2 and 3 percentages (by weight). For evaluating geotechnical behavior of improved clay-gravel mixtures, compaction and California bearing ratio test (CBR) (in dry and saturate conditions) based on ASTM were performed.        
It should be noted CBR test in dry and saturate conditions were carried out in three different compaction energies (i.e. 10, 25 and 56 blow count for per layer). Moreover, CBR was evaluated for piston penetration at 2.5 and 5 cm in the specimen.
Results and discussion
The findings of this study could be summarized as:
1. Results of compaction test showed that, in the unimproved position, with increasing gravel content in clay, maximum dry unit weight (γdmax) has been increased, while simultaneous optimum water content (wopt) decreased.
In the improved position, in the first mode, when a geotextile layer was embedded in the middle of the specimens, γdmax reached to its upper value, whereas wopt reached to its minimum value. On the other hand, with an increase in the number of geotextile layers in clay-gravel mixtures, dry density has been decreased, but optimum water content increased. Furthermore, in the second mode, when geotextile pieces with 1×1 and 5×5 cm2 were randomly mixed in the specimens, the findings revealed that geotextile pieces with 1 cm2 areas and 1% by weight in clay-gravel mixtures increases γdmax and reduces wopt.
2. In dry and saturate conditions, California bearing ratio (CBR) test result displayed that in the unimproved condition, with an increase in gravel content in the clay, CBR value has been increased. In the improved situation, in the first mode, when a geotextile layer was embedded in the samples, CBR had a maximum value in all of the compaction energies even though it is reduced as the number of layers increased. In the second mode, when geotextile pieces in 1×1 cm dimensions with 1% (by weight) were randomly mixed with the specimens, CBR value reached at high.  In contrast, with increasing dimensions of pieces and percentages in the presence of geotextile in clay-gravel mixtures, CBR values declined.  Therefore, it can be concluded that, according to Code 234 (Iran Highway Asphalt Paving Code), the application of one geotextile sheet in the middle of materials or geotextile pieces in 1×1 cm dimensions with 1% (by weight) random mixing  is suitable for subbase and base layers in pavement design.
3. CBR test results in the saturate condition in clay-gravel mixtures illustrated that, in the non-reinforced condition, with an increase in clay content in specimens, swelling value keeps rising sharply. On the contrary, in the reinforced position with embedding a geotextile layer in the middle sector of samples or through adding geotextile pieces (1 cm2) with 1 % content  (by weight) to the specimens, the rate of swelling significantly decreased.   
Conclusion
To sum up, the main objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of geotextile applications on bearing capacity of clay-gravel mixtures in pavement layers. The findings demonstrated that when geotextile as a layer was embedded in the middle part of specimens or as pieces with 1×1 cm dimensions and 1% content (by weight) was randomly mixed with the mid materials, the bearing capacity of the reinforced specimens was enhanced.  In contrast, in the saturate condition, swelling potential significantly was reduced. It is noteworthy to mention that 1 cm2 pieces of geotextile is more effective than the layers. This is due to the fact these pieces make aggregates closer to each other. Thereby, minimum void ratio (emin) reaches its least value, the structure of grading improves, and the contacts between particles and geotextile pieces rise. As a suggestion for further research, it looks promising to evaluate the dynamic properties and the behavior of the improved materials with other geosyntheticses.
 
Soheil Ghareh, Kimiya Yazdani, Fatemeh Akhlaghi,
Volume 14, Issue 4 (12-2020)
Abstract

Introduction
The existence of problematic soils due to their geotechnical properties, such as low strength and stability, high compressibility, and swelling, is one of the most important issues and challenges that geotechnical and civil engineers are faced in urban environments, especially in metropolises. Various methods are used to stabilize and to improve the behavior of problematical soils such as compaction, consolidation, stone columns, jet grouting, biological procedures, and additive materials including nanomaterials. Because of their high specific surface, the use of nanoparticles is very effective to increase the shear and mechanical strength parameters of soil. Mashhad city is located on alluvial deposits of Mashhad Plain. A wide area of this city, especially the central and eastern areas where the Imam Reza holy shrine is located, has been built on weak and fine-grained deposits. Considering constructing high-rise buildings such as hotels and commercial complexes in these areas, as well as the need for restructuring the urban decay, the soil improvement will be inevitable. Given the significant application of these nanoparticles, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of nanoclay and nanosilica on each other and to find their optimal composition as a suitable alternative for traditional materials to improve the weak and problematic soils. This not only increases the bearing capacity and strength properties but also reduces the cost and time of project implementation.
Method and Materials
To achieve a hybrid with maximum strength and bearing capacity in executable projects, laboratory tests were performed on the soil picked up from the vicinity around Razavi holy shrine in Mashhad mixed with nanoclay and nanosilica. The type of soil is classified as CL-ML based on sieve and hydrometer tests. The nanoclay used in this research is the type of montmorillonite- K10, and the nanosilica is as a powdered shape with 99% purity.
At first, nanoclay and nanosilica were mixed independently with soil in six different weight ratios (0%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2.5%, & 5%) and (0%, 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, & 1%). Soil mechanical and strength properties, including compressive and shear strength, settlement, plasticity index, and swelling, were studied by standard laboratory tests on all specimens. After determining the optimum ratio of each nanoparticle, four hybrids consisting of nanosilica and nanoclay were made in four different combinations and then the effects of these four hybrids were investigated on the soil in the laboratory scale (Table 1).
Table 1. Composition of hybrids made with different percentages of nanomaterials
Nanomaterials composition Hybrid Name
5% Nanoclay + 0.25% Nanosilica 5NC + 0.25NS
5% Nanoclay  1% Nanosilica 5NC + 1NS
2.5% Nanoclay + 0.25% Nanosilica 2.5NC + 0.25NS
2.5% Nanoclay + 1% Nanosilica 2.5NC + 1NS
Conclusion
The results of the Atterberg limit test on improved and pure soil indicate that the addition of nanoclay and nanosilica and the optimized ratios of these nanoparticles hybrid to increase the soil resistance parameters did not change the soil swelling index.
Evaluation of shear strength test results showed a significant synergistic effect of these nanoparticles on increasing the shear strength parameters. The nanoparticles hybrid of 2.5% nanosilica and 1% nanosilica increased the cohesion up to 106% and also hybrids of 5% nanosilica and 1% nanosilica increased the internal friction angle of soil up to 32%.
Examination of unconfined compressive strength tests presented a 134% increase in the compressive strength of the specimen improved with 2.5% nanoclay and a 620% increase in soil improved with 1% nanosilica. The optimum hybrid compositions of 5% nanoclay and 1% nanosilica increased significantly the compressive strength of the studied soil up to 785% and reduced the settlement of the soil by 60% compared to pure soil.
  1. Laboratory studies of electron microscopy examination on ​​pure and improved soil samples with nanoparticle hybrid revealed the presence of these particles in pores of the improved soil. On the other hand, the high specific surface area of ​​the nanoparticles increased the interaction of the soil particles, and the effect of adding these nanoparticles on the refining process is observed in compressive strength increase.
As the nanoclay, nanosilica, and hybrid of nanoparticles are the results of soil processing, these particles are very effective to solve the environmental problems because of good compatibility with soil environments. In addition, low volumes of nanoclay, nanosilica, and hybrid in these nanoparticles are necessary to increase the compressive strength and decrease the settlement of soil. Therefore, using these nanoparticles at the project site reduces significantly the cost and execution time of the project.
 
 
Mohammad Hossein Keyghobadi, Adel Asakereh, Behzad Kalantari, Masoud Dehghani,
Volume 15, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Abstract

Introduction
The ring footings are very important and sensitive due to widespread use in various industries such as oil and gas; so finding some ways for improving the behavior of these types of footings can be very valuable. One of these ways, which is very affordable and also can be help in environmental protection, is the use of granulated rubber that made from disposable materials like scrape tires, as the soil reinforcement. In the present study, the behavior of ring footings with outer constant diameter of 300 mm and variable inner diameters (90, 120 and 150 mm with inner to outer diameter ratio of 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5) placed on unreinforced sand bed and also granulated rubber reinforced bed, has been investigated by field test. The effects of important parameters like inner to outer diameter ratio of ring footing and thickness of rubber-soil mixture on the behavior of ring footing in terms of bearing capacity, settlement and inside vertical stresses of footing bed have been studied and the optimum values mentioned parameters have been determined.
Material and methods
In all tests, a sandy soil was used to fill the test trench which was excavated in the natural bed of the earth with a length and width of 2000 mm and a height of 990 mm. It should be noted that the type of this soil is well-graded sand (SW) according to the Unified Classification System (ASTM D 2487-11). This sand had medium grain size, D50, of 2.35 mm, moisture content of 5.4% and friction angle of 41.7. The granulated rubber particles with dimensions between 2-20 mm, a mean particle size, D50, of 14 mm and a specific gravity, Gs, of 1.15, have been used in all tests for using in rubber-soil mixture layer.
The loading system consists of several parts such as loading frame for providing reaction force, hydraulic jack, load cell, load transfer system (including loading shaft which was located below Load cell and footing cap which was located under the loading shaft) and rigid steel loading plates with different inner to outer diameter ratios (d/D=0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 and constant outer diameter of 300 mm). Some devices like load cell, LVDT, pressure cell, data logger and unit control were applied to collect the data and control the system. Both soil and rubber-soil mixture layers were compacted by vibrating plate compactor to gain their maximum densities. After preparing the tests, the static load was applied on the system at a rate of 1 kPa per second until 1000 kPa or until backfill failure.
Results and discussion
The results of tests on both unreinforced and rubber reinforced beds indicated that the ring footing with inner to outer diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.4 had the maximum bearing capacity in all settlement levels. This behavior can be related to the arching phenomenon within the internal spaces of ring footing with optimum inner to outer diameter ratio. In fact, when the ring footing with optimum inner to outer diameter ratio is subjected to a certain level of loading, the soil inside the ring seems to be compacted due to interface effect of the two sides of the ring. However, by increasing the inner to outer diameter ratio more than its optimum value, the ring behaves like two independent strip footings without any interface effect and therefore the bearing capacity decreases.
The results of tests showed that the vertical inside stresses in different depths of footing bed (both unreinforced and rubber reinforced beds) decrease with increasing d/D ratio. This stress reduction process can be due to the transfer of stress concentration from the points close to the center of the ring to the outer point because of turning from the ring mode with interface effect to the two independent strip footings that mentioned earlier.
The results of rubber reinforced cases illustrated that, regardless of the footing settlement level and also irrespective of d/D ratio, the bearing capacity of ring footing increases with increasing the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer (hrs) up to the value equals 0.5 times the outer diameter of ring footing and further increase in this thickness more than mentioned optimum value (hrs/D=0.5) can decrease the bearing capacity. Even in some cases of reinforced base (hrs/D=1), the bearing capacity can be reduced to the value less than that of unreinforced cases. It can be due to high compressibility of rubber reinforced layers with higher thicknesses than optimum value.
It should be mentioned that the rubber reinforced layer can reduce the vertical inside stresses compared to unreinforced cases. It can be due to this fact that the rubber reinforced layer acts as a wide slab. Such that it can spread the applied loading over a wider area. Also rubber reinforced layer has high capacity of absorbing energy and therefore can decrease the vertical inside stresses.
Conclusion
In the present study the behavior of ring footing placed on rubber reinforced bed have been investigated by field test. The effect of different parameters such as inner to outer diameter ratio of ring footing and the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer on the bearing capacity, settlement and vertical inside stresses of the footing bed were studied. The result indicates that:
- In both unreinforced and rubber reinforced bed, the ring footing with inner to outer diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.4 had the maximum bearing capacity, regardless of settlement level.
-The vertical inside stresses in different depths of footing bed decrease with increasing d/D ratio.
-The bearing capacity of ring footing increases with increasing the thickness of rubber-soil mixture layer (hrs) up to the optimum value equals 0.5 times the outer diameter of ring footing.
-The vertical stresses can be reduced by using rubber reinforced layer../files/site1/files/151/5.pdf
 
, ,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (12-2021)
Abstract

Clayey soils in terms of sharp reduction in strength and swelling ability as a results of water and moisture absorption, it is considered as one of the most problematic soils in civil engineering and construction works. Nowadays, Nano materials such as Nano clay are used to improve and stabilize of clay. On the other side, the increasing volume of municipal waste and residues materials especially debris of building destruction have caused many problems in mega cities such as environmental issues due to incorrect disposal of waste material. Main propose of this research is study of possibility in effecting Nano clay and limestone powder mixture for improve geotechnical properties of Kuye Nasr clayey soil in Tabriz City. In this study, Nano clay and limestone powder in both separate and combined conditions with 5 and 10 percentage are mixed with clay. Curing of stabilized specimens have been performed in 7, 14 and 28 days. For evaluating geotechnical behavior of mixture materials some tests were performed such as Atterberg limits, Compaction, uniaxial strength and direct shear (in 1, 2 and 3 kg/cm2 vertical stress). Results show that the simultaneous effects of 5% Nano clay with 10% limestone powder with 7 days curing period in ambient temperature conditions in clay reduced plasticity index by 72%, improved graining skeleton structure, reduced void ratio of inter grains and increased shear strength by 33%.

./files/site1/files/%DA%86%DA%A9%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%87_%D8%BA%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C.pdf

 
Mahmood Reza Abdi, Mahdi Safdari Seh Gonbad, Hoshmand Tirandazi,
Volume 15, Issue 3 (12-2021)
Abstract

In current paper the effects of surface unreinforced / reinforced sand layers coupled with and without single and group sand columns on the bearing capacity – settlement behavior of soft clays has been investigated. In this regard behavior of soft clay, clay + unreinforced / reinforced sand layer, clay + single / group sand piles and clay + unreinforced / reinforced sand layer + single / group piles samples has been assessed. Geogrid was adopted as the reinforcement, a circular plate 5cm in diameter as the loading surface and C.B.R. apparatus as the loading system. Results show that employing unreinforced / reinforced sand layers at a settlement ratio of 5% improves bearing capacity by 4 t0 7 times the soft clay. Coupling the surface unreinforced / reinforced sand layers with single / group sand piles further increases the bearing capacity by 7 to 9 times that of soft clay.

./files/site1/files/%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF%DB%8C.pdf
 
Zahra Aghayan, Rouzbeh Dabiri,
Volume 18, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Abstract

Recently, the demand for rapid and cost-effective infrastructure development has led to the has led to the development of various soil improvement techniques, including stabilization. Studies on the incorporation of mineral materials such as lime and coal ash into soil stabilization have been carried out in several countries, and these studies have shown promising results. Given the beneficial properties or properties of coal ash, together with its availability and cost-effectiveness, the combination of coal ash with lime for clay soil stabilization is a viable option. This study evaluates lime and coal ash on the behavior and geotechnical properties of clay soils. The evaluation includes plasticity index (PI), compaction, uniaxial compressive strength, California bearing ratio (CBR) and direct shear tests, and direct shear tests. To achieve this, the process began with the mixing of clay with varying percentages of hydrated lime (4%, 6% and 7%), followed by a 28-day curing period for the samples. Coal ash was then added at different (5%, 15%, 25% and 50%) was incorporated into the clay and also cured for 28 days. In the final stage, the optimum amount of hydrated lime was determined, an amount of hydrated lime, equivalent to the amount of coal ash used, was added to the clay and the mixture was cured for a further 28 days. The results indicate that A mixture of 7% hydrated lime and 50% coal ash, after 28 days of curing, is an optimum combination for stabilizing the clay in the study area. This combination increased the uniaxial compressive strength by 1.87 times, the shear strength by 1.34 times and the CBR value by 6.4 times, making it suitable for use in the for use in the construction of pavement layers.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Engineering Geology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb