|
|
|
|
|
 |
جستجو در مقالات منتشر شده |
 |
|
7 نتیجه برای Nour
، ،
دوره 19، شماره 2 - ( 6-1395 )
چکیده
Leila Jooybary، Shahab Moradkhani، Nourrodin Yousofi،
دوره 20، شماره 2 - ( 6-1396 )
چکیده
Soroor Ashtarian، Saman Ebadi، Nourodin Yousofi،
دوره 21، شماره 2 - ( 6-1397 )
چکیده
| This study aimed to investigate the application of Group Dynamic Assessment (GDA) to writing accuracy of EFL learners and explore whether secondary interactants could benefit from interactions between mediator and primary interactants. The idea of implementing DA (Dynamic Assessment) in dyads seems unworkable since teachers are required to teach the whole class (Guk & Kellog, 2007). Moreover, Lantolf and Poehner (2004) suggest a new approach to DA that is GDA, which involves applying DA with a large number of learners rather than individuals. Following a multiple case study design and interactionist DA, the development of ten students in a class of twenty five was tracked during the eight sessions of DA program. Data were collected though written artifacts, video-recording of interactions, interview, and observation. The results indicated that GDA was an effective way of helping learners overcome their linguistic problems and there were signs of microgenetic as well as macrogenetic development within the same DA session and across sessions. The present findings provide further insight into understanding how secondary interactants benefit from the interactions between mediator and primary interactants. |
سعید نورزاده، جلیل فتحی، مجید سلطانی مقدم،
دوره 23، شماره 1 - ( 1-1399 )
چکیده
هدف این مطالعه گردآوری شواهدی دال بر اعتبار سازه پرسشنامه "چه اتفاقی در این کلاس در حال رخ دادن است" در بافت آموزش زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجه در ایران میباشد. گرچه حوزه آموزش زبان ادعاهایی درباره نقش محیطهای یادگیری زبان (بهویژه کلاس) در فراگیری و استفاده از زبان دوم داشته است، اما ابزاری روا و پایا به منظور بررسی درستی این ادعاها برای معلمان و پژوهشگران فراهم نیاورده است. به منظور تحقق این هدف، در مطالعه حاضر، از نمونهای شامل 607 فراگیر زبان انگلیسی ایرانی در هر دو بافت دانشگاه و مؤسسه درخواست شد که پرسشنامه "چه اتفاقی در این کلاس در حال رخ دادن است" را تکمیل نمایند. سپس دادههای گردآوری شده به منظور اعتبارسنجی سازه پرسشنامه مورد تحلیل عاملی تاییدی و اکتشافی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که حذف یک عامل و چندین گویه از نسخه اصلی پرسشنامه ویژگیهای روانسنجی آن را بهبود میبخشد و بنابراین اعتبار پرسشنامه با شش عامل تایید گردید. علاوه بر این، نتایج نشان داد که ویژگیهای روانسنجی پرسشنامه در بافتهای آموزش (دانشگاه و مؤسسه) تغییرناپذیر است. در ادامه اهمیت این یافتهها برای پژوهش در محیطهای یادگیری زبان بحث و بررسی و پیشنهادهایی برای مطالعات اعتبارسنجی بیشتر ارائه شده است.
، ، ،
دوره 24، شماره 2 - ( 6-1400 )
چکیده
Zahra Naderifarjad، Yousofi Nourodin،
دوره 25، شماره 2 - ( 6-1401 )
چکیده
An intervention study was conducted to investigate whether individuals with Down syndrome would benefit from teaching alphabetic skill and single word reading in foreign /second language despite their phonological, cognitive, memory, and intellectual disabilities. This study is a part of a longitudinal case study focusing on developing a program for reading English done at three stages which comprised teaching English alphabet, vocabulary, and reading. The study focused on a Persian speaking girl with Down syndrome who demonstrated phonological deficit prior to intervention. Data were collected by video recording, documentation, and keeping diaries. Assessments of progress were made at the beginning of a new session following the last teaching session and maintenance of gains was held three months after the last teaching session. The result showed significant gains in reading monosyllabic words. The findings demonstrated that Down syndrome individuals can learn basic reading skill in second / foreign language using "combined approach of phonics and reading" along with multisensory language learning approach (MSL).
Natasha Pourdana، Payam Nour،
دوره 26، شماره 1 - ( 1-1402 )
چکیده
Due to inconclusive evidence for the differential impacts of portfolio assessment (PA) on genre-based writing improvement and learner engagement, this study cross-examined 46 EFL undergraduates’ descriptive and narrative writing performances in a 12-week PA design. Teacher feedback points were collected from consecutive formative assessments of the students’ descriptive and narrative writing according to the genre-specific indicators in the West Virginia Department of Education descriptive writing rubric and Smarter Balanced narrative writing rubric, respectively. Statistical results reported the significant impact of PA on improving accurate word choice and grammar, development, and organization of ideas in session-wise students’ descriptive writing, with no sign of improvement in their performance on post-test descriptive writing. Further, the positive impact of PA was supported by improving the components of elaboration of narrative, language and vocabulary, organization, and convention in session-wise students’ narrative writing, as well as their performance on post-test narrative writing. Qualitative data on students’ engagement in PA was collected from inductive content analysis of their reflective journals. Students’ self-reports were schematized, and their level of engagement was rendered in terms of their approval of the usefulness and novelty of PA, the frequent mismatch between student self-assessment and teacher feedback both in quality and quantity, the sensitivity of teacher feedback to some writing features over others, the applicability of teacher feedback to the revision process, and overall positive perception of writing improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
صاحب امتیاز
