Volume 11, Issue 2 (9-2024)
Human Information Interaction 2024, 11(2): 23-47 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rouhi Shalemaie S, Khandan M, Shabani A. Providing An Intergenerational Knowledge Sharing Model For The Car Leasing Industry. Human Information Interaction 2024; 11 (2)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3149-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3149-en.html
Department of Information Science and Knowledge Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (5044 Views)
Objective: This research aimed to design a model for intergenerational knowledge sharing in order to identify the dimensions and rank the factors and components affecting intergenerational knowledge sharing in the car leasing industry.
Methodology: This is an applied research conducted using a mixed exploratory method. The research population was divided into two parts: in the first part (qualitative), the population consisted of 17 experts and specialists in the leasing industry who were selected purposefully, and in the second part (quantitative), the population was 970 employees working in the car leasing industry. Based on the Cochran formula and a 22% minimum sample increase, 336 individuals were randomly selected as the sample. Data was collected through library and field methods using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. The MAXQDA and SMART PLS software were used to analyze the obtained data.
Findings: The findings showed that the components of knowledge sharing, external environment, innovation, future orientation, reactive, analytical, IT governance, organizational structure, learning organization, organizational learning, and knowledge management have a direct and significant impact on intergenerational knowledge sharing in the leasing industry.
Conclusion: Based on the analysis and identification of the components (knowledge sharing, external environment, innovation, future orientation, reactive, analytical, IT governance, organizational structure, learning organization, organizational learning, and knowledge management), it can be concluded that all these components constitute a suitable model for improving the performance of the car leasing industry, and it is recommended that this model be considered to advance the goals and success of this industry.
Methodology: This is an applied research conducted using a mixed exploratory method. The research population was divided into two parts: in the first part (qualitative), the population consisted of 17 experts and specialists in the leasing industry who were selected purposefully, and in the second part (quantitative), the population was 970 employees working in the car leasing industry. Based on the Cochran formula and a 22% minimum sample increase, 336 individuals were randomly selected as the sample. Data was collected through library and field methods using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. The MAXQDA and SMART PLS software were used to analyze the obtained data.
Findings: The findings showed that the components of knowledge sharing, external environment, innovation, future orientation, reactive, analytical, IT governance, organizational structure, learning organization, organizational learning, and knowledge management have a direct and significant impact on intergenerational knowledge sharing in the leasing industry.
Conclusion: Based on the analysis and identification of the components (knowledge sharing, external environment, innovation, future orientation, reactive, analytical, IT governance, organizational structure, learning organization, organizational learning, and knowledge management), it can be concluded that all these components constitute a suitable model for improving the performance of the car leasing industry, and it is recommended that this model be considered to advance the goals and success of this industry.
Keywords: knowledge sharing, intergenerational knowledge, intergenerational knowledge sharing, leasing industry
References
1. Becker, K. L., Richards, M. B., & Stollings, J. (2020). Better together? Examining benefits and tensions of generational diversity and team performance. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1-21.
2. Bjursell, C. (2015). Organizing for intergenerational learning and knowledge sharing. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 13(4), 285-301.
3. Çelik, Ç., & Polat, S. (2022). The relationship between intergenerational knowledge sharing and intergenerational learning levels among teachers. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1-15.
4. Elmi, S. (2020). Intergenerational Knowledge Sharing: The Relationship between Work Characteristics and Knowledge Sharing and the Moderating Effect of Age (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University).
5. Klein, J., & Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2016). Intergenerational sharing of knowledge as means of deepening the organisational learning culture in schools. School Leadership & Management, 36(2), 133-150.
6. Kordova, S., Or, O., & Benis, A. (2022). Intergenerational knowledge management in a cutting-edge Israeli industry: Visions and challenges. Plos one, 17(7).
7. Lee, Y., Howe, C., Mishra, S., Lee, D. S., Mahmood, M., Piper, M., ... & Yeo, W. H. (2018). Wireless, intraoral hybrid electronics for real-time quantification of sodium intake toward hypertension management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(21), 5377-5382.
8. Leon, R. D. (2020). Fostering intergenerational learning in the hotel industry: A multiple criteria decision-making model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102685.
9. Leoni, L., Ardolino, M., El Baz, J., Gueli, G., & Bacchetti, A. (2022). The mediating role of knowledge management processes in the effective use of artificial intelligence in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 411-437.
10. Peet, M. R., Walsh, K., Sober, R., & Rawak, C. S. (2010). Generative Knowledge Interviewing: A method for knowledge transfer and talent management at the University of Michigan. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 10(2), 71-85.
11. Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Mirvis, P., & Berzin, S. (2013). Leveraging age diversity for innovation. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 11(3), 238-254.
12. Singh, S., Thomas, N., & Numbudiri, R. (2021). Knowledge sharing in times of a pandemic: An intergenerational learning approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(2), 153-164.
13. Starks, A. (2013). The forthcoming generational workforce transition and rethinking organizational knowledge transfer. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 11(3), 223-237.
14. Suomäki, A., Kianto, A., & Vanhala, M. (2019). Work engagement across different generations in Finland: a qualitative study of Boomers, Yers and Xers. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(2), 140-151.
15. Tang, J., & Martins, J. T. (2021). Intergenerational workplace knowledge sharing: challenges and new directions. Journal of Documentation.
16. Triana, I., Tuori, M. A., & Herlina, M. G. (2021). Iternational knowledge workers in Indonesian service industry: A management view. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(3), 1-6.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
