Volume 10, Issue 19 (8-2020)                   JRSM 2020, 10(19): 16-30 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
shahbazi M, bohloul A, modaberi S. Accreditation the Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Motor Coordination Measuring Instrument. JRSM 2020; 10 (19) :16-30
URL: http://jrsm.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2420-en.html
Accreditation the Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Motor Coordination Measuring Instrument
Mehdi Shahbazi1 , Akbar Bohloul 2, Shaghayegh Modaberi1
1- Tehran University
2- Tehran University , akbar.bohloul69@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3717 Views)

Measuring instrument of interpersonal and intrapersonal motor coordination has designed and built to provide information about the human movements’ coordination in reach of researchers, trainers and therapists. To evaluate the validation of this instrument with using of Vienna two hands coordination test and present research instrument were asked 28 participants to do the task of two hands, two feet and interpersonal movement coordination. Pearson correlation test showed that the present research instrument has high validation in motor coordination of two hands in total time mean factor of joystick (r =0/88), knob (r =0/96) and in error percentage mean factor of joystick (r =0/89) and knob (r =0/87). Also the results of Cronbach’s alpha showed that present research instrument has appropriate reliability in motor coordination of two hands in total time mean factor of joystick (r =0/89) and knob (r =0/97) and in error time percentage mean factor of joystick  (r =0/81) and knob (r =0/85). Also results indicated acceptable reliability in motor coordination of two feet in total time mean factor of pedals (r =0/90) and in error time percentage mean factor of pedals (r =0/83) and in interpersonal motor coordination in total time mean factor (r =0/91) and in error time percentage mean factor (r =0/80). Therefore using the present study instrument can be offered to sports science laboratories in all higher education institutions, federations and coaches, patients and rehabilitation centers, health and physiotherapy clinics.

Keywords: Accreditation, motor control, interpersonal motor coordination, intrapersonal motor coordination, Vienna
Full-Text [PDF 1276 kb]   (1721 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: motor behavior
Received: 2016/12/25 | Accepted: 2017/08/1 | Published: 2020/08/31
References
1. 1. Harro A. Classification of behavioral goals in the psychomotor area. 2 ed. Tehran: The Ministry of Education, Research and Planning Organization; 1989.
2. Richard M. Motor Learning :Concepts and Applications 8ed. Tehran: Hananeh; 2017.
3. Âbasi S, Hadian MR. The Effect of Eye-Hand Coordination Activities on Hand Skills of 7-10 Year-Old Educable Students with Down Syndrome. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2011;21(83):54-8.
4. Swinnen SP, Lee TD, Verschueren S, Serrien DJ, Bogaerds H. Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human movement science. 1997;16(6):749-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(97)00020-1]
5. Ghanavati T, Salavati M, Karimi N, Negahban H, Takamjani IE, Mehravar M, et al. Intra-limb coordination while walking is affected by cognitive load and walking speed. Journal of biomechanics. 2014;47(10):2300-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.038]
6. Nagaraj T. Effect of general specific and combined fitness training on selected skill related fitness and performance among cricket players. Paripex-Indian journal of research. 2017; 5(3): 47-48‌.
7. Abedin M, Ali H, Hadi Y. Effect of Aging and Volleyball Experience on the Continuous Bimanual Coordination Task. Scientific Journal Management System. 2012;2(5):5-18.
8. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Corriveau H. Validation of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(5):993-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.007]
9. Cardoso AA, Magalhães Lde C. Bilateral coordination and motor sequencing in Brazilian children: preliminary construct validity and reliability analysis. Occupational therapy international. 2009;16(2):107-21. [DOI:10.1002/oti.273]
10. Vaara M, SL K. Reliability of novel coordination and balance tests. 14th International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy 7-12 June; Barcelona, Spain2003.
11. Ong NCH. The use of the Vienna Test System in sport psychology research: A review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2015;8(1):204-23. [DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2015.1061581]
12. Chraif M, Ani ei M. Gender Differences in Motor Coordination at Young Students at Psychology. International journal of social science and humanity. 2013:147-50. [DOI:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.215]
13. Nazemzadegan g, bagherzadeh f, hemayattalab r, farsi a. The Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Load on Duration and Accuracy of Bimanual Coordination Task. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement. 2010;2(1):133-49.
14. Farsi A, Abdoli B, Kaviyani M. The Comparison of the Effects of Attentional-Cognitive Load and Motor-Cognitive Load on Bimanual Coordination Performance. Development & Motor Learning. 2011;3(7):43-.
15. Heydar S, Mohammad H. Design, construction, validation and reliability of simultaneous kinematic measurement of kinematic motion and distribution of water pressure in swimming. Sports Medicine Studies. 2010(7):31-46.
16. Latash ML. Fundamentals of Motor Control. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. 149-70 p. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-415956-3.00009-9]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb