[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Copyright
Ethics
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Reviewers List
Reviewers List vol1403
Reviewers List vol1402
Reviewers List vol1401
Reviewers List vol1400
Reviewers List vol 1399
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Reviewers List vol1403
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Publication statistics::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Publication Information
ju Publisher
Kharazmi University
ju Managing Director 
Nasergholi Sarli
ju Editor-in-Chief
Habib-Allah Abbasi
ju Manager
Zahra Saberi
ju In charge of the Site
Tahereh sadate Mirahmadi
EISSN 24766941
..
Indexing Databases

  AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
 AWT IMAGE   AWT IMAGE 
  AWT IMAGE 

   
..
Social Networks
   
..
:: Volume 31, Issue 94 (6-2023) ::
Persian Language and Literature 2023, 31(94): 189-208 Back to browse issues page
Deconstructing and going far beyond the binary oppositions in Sufi texts (data from Persian prose books)
Nasergholi Sarli * 1, Akram Ghorbani Cheraghtappeh2
1- Kharazmi University , sarli@khu.ac.ir
2- Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (3124 Views)
The researchers of mysticism and Islamic Sufism have considered the making of the language of Sufism and mystical discourse as one of the most important aspects of the history of Sufism. Especially the gradual differentiation of the language of Sufism from the language of religion and its transformation into an independent discourse has been the subject of valuable researches. The researchers have demonstrated that mystical experience and Qur'anic interpretation are inseparable at first and the language of mystical experience merely uses Quranic words, but gradually, mystical experience becomes independent and adopts the Qur'anic language/language of religion and acquires its very own language. One of the lexical features of the language of Qur'an/religion is the use of binary opposition. Binary oppositions such as Paradise/Hell, Good/Evil, this world/the Hereafter among the basic religious and Quranic teachings and are used with high frequency in Sufi texts. The use of binary oppositions in Sufi texts goes far beyond religious binary opposition, and especially in Sufi textbooks, many new terms are formed based on binary opposition.One of the distinguishing aspects of the language of Sufism is the deconstruction of binary oppositions. The deconstruction is applied both in the binary oppositions of religion and in the oppositions formed in the language of Sufism. It has various and different forms and aspects, and its analysis may provide us with the most creative and innovative aspects of Sufis' worldview and mystical experience. This linguistic invention, which is rooted in the novelty and uniqueness of mystical experience, is a sign of the authenticity of that experience. In this research, we have investigated the deconstruction and departure from binary opposition in a corpus including the most creative words of the Sufis in Persian prose texts. By analyzing and classifying the different forms of the deconstruction and going beyond the binary opposition, the article shows how this feature grants the language of Sufism a special artistic and poetic characteristic, and places it in a completely different level compared to religious texts and the language of Shariat. Going far beyond the binary oppositions is closely related to the paradoxical feature of the language of Sufism and provides the possibility of expressing more complex experiences for Sufis.
Keywords: Binary Opposition, Deconstruction, Language of Sufism, Language of Quran/Language of Religion, Persian Prose.
Full-Text [PDF 3736 kb]   (1050 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. آبشيريني، اسد (1396). بررسي تقابل عشق و مرگ در ساختار شعر فروغ فرخزاد. شعرپژوهي (بوستان ادب). سال نهم. شمارة 2: 1-24.
2. آلگونه جونقاني، مسعود (1393). رويکرد سنايي به تقابل¬هاي دوگاني. مطالعات عرفاني. شمارة 19: 29-54.
3. باقري خليلي، علي‌اکبر؛ و ذبيح¬پور، سيده فاطمه (1393). تحليل ساختاري تقابل نشانه¬اي در غزليات حافظ با تکيه بر نظريه رولان بارت. پژوهش زبان و ادبيات فارسي. شمارة 35: 25-53.
4. بالدس، ماريو (1384). تقابل دوگاني. در: مکاريک. دانشنامة نظريه‌هاي ادبي معاصر. ترجمة مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوي. تهران: آگه.
5. چندلر، دانيل (1394). مباني نشانه‌شناسي. ترجمة مهدي پارسا. چاپ پنجم. تهران: سورة مهر.
6. چهري، طاهره؛ سالميان، غلامرضا؛ و ياري گل‌دره، سهيل (1392). تحليل تقابل¬ها و تضادهاي واژگاني در شعر سنايي. پژوهش‌هاي ادب عرفاني (گوهر گويا). سال هفتم. شمارة 2: 141-158.
7. حياتي، زهرا (1388). بررسي نشانه¬شناختي عناصر متقابل در تصويرپردازي اشعار مولانا. نقد ادبي. سال دوم. شمارة 6: 7-24.
8. روحاني، مسعود؛ عنايتي قاديکلايي، مسعود (1395). تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در غزليات عطار نيشابوري. زبان و ادبيات فارسي دانشگاه خوارزمي. سال بيست‌وچهارم. شمارة 26 (پياپي 81): 201-221.
9. شريف‌نسب، مريم (1394). تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در داستان¬هاي عامه. فرهنگ و ادبيات عامه. سال دوم. شمارة 6: 1-20.
10. شنبه¬اي، رقيه (1390). جبر و اختيار از ديدگاه تقابل¬هاي دوگانه سبک خاص سعدي در گلستان. تحليل و تفسير متون ادب فارسي (دهخدا). سال سوم. شمارة 8: 194-212.
11. عابدي، محمود (1385). يک حرف صوفيانه؛ سخناني از عارفان. تهران: سخن.
12. عبيدي‌نيا، محمدامير؛ و دلائي‌ ميلان، علی (1388). بررسي تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در ساختار حديقة سنايي. پژوهش زبان و ادبيات فارسي. شمارة 13: 25-42.
13. عقدايي، تورج؛ و شهرآبادي، راضيه (1398). نقد، بررسي و تحليل تقابل حيرت و يقين در غزليات عطار. تحليل و تفسير متون ادب فارسي (دهخدا). سال يازدهم. شمارة 42: 61-82.
14. قرباني چراغ‌تپه، اکرم (1401). تقابل¬هاي دوگاني در متون فارسي نثر صوفيه از آغاز تا پايان قرن هفتم هجري. رسالة دکتري زبان و ادبيات فارسي. دانشگاه خوارزمي.
15. کالر، جاناتان (1388). بوطيقاي ساخت‌گرا. ترجمة کوروش صفوي. تهران: مينوي‌خرد.
16. محمدي، احمد (1396). تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در داستان رستم و سهراب. رشد و آموزش زبان و ادب فارسي. سال سی‌ام. شمارة 3: 71-73.
17. مکاريک، ايرنا ريما (1384). دانشنامة نظريه‌هاي ادبي معاصر. ترجمة مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوي. تهران: آگه.
18. نبي¬لو، عليرضا (1392). بررسي تقابل¬هاي دوگانه در غزليات حافظ. زبان و ادبيات فارسي دانشگاه خوارزمي. سال بيست‌ويکم. شمارة 19 (پياپي 74): 69-91.
19. نويا، پل (1373). تفسير قرآني و زبان عرفاني. ترجمة اسماعيل سعادت. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهي.
20. وبستر، راجر (1373). ژاک دريدا و واسازي متن. ارغنون. سال اول. شمارۀ 4: 251-256.
21. Dundes, Alan (1997). Binary Opposition in Myth: The Propp/Lévi-Strauss Debate in Retrospect. Western Folklore. Vol. 56. No. Pp: 39-50. [DOI:10.2307/1500385]
22. Hawkes, Terence (2003). Structuralism and Semiotics. Second edition. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203100516]
23. Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1972). Structural Anthropology (trans. Claire Jacobson & Brooke Grundfest Schoepf). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
24. Ābedi, Mahmoud (2006). A Sufi Said: Selected Sayings of Sufis. Tehrān: Sokhan [In Persian]
25. Abidiniā, M.A. and Dalāei Milān, A. (2009). "Survey of Binary Oppositions in the Structure of Hadigheh of Sanaei". Research in Persian Language and Literature. No. 13: 25-42. [In Persian]
26. Ābshirini, A. (2017). The studying of the contrast of love and death in the poetry of Forough Farrukhzad. Journal of Poetry Studies (boostān-e Adab), 9(2), 1-24. [In Persian]
27. Aghdāei, T. and Shahrābādi, R. (2020). Critique, Survey and Analysis of Surprise and Believe in Ghazals of Attār. Dehkhodā. Vol. 11 No. 42: 61-82. [In Persian]
28. Algouneh Jounaghāni, M. (2014). Sanāyi's Approach Towards Binary Oppositions. Mystical Studies, 10(1), 29-54. [In Persian]
29. Bāgheri Khalili, A.; & Zabihpour. S.F. (2013). Structural analysis of semiotic opposition in Ghazal's of Hafiz based on R. Barthes theory. Rrsearch in Persian Language and Literature. Vol. 12. No. 35: 25-53. [In Persian]
30. Chandler, Daniel (2022). Semiotics: The Basics. translated by Mahdi Pārsā, Tehrān: Soureh-ye Mehr. [In Persian] [DOI:10.4324/9781003155744]
31. Chehri, T., Salemiyān, G.; & Yāri Goldarreh, S. (2014). An Analysis of Lexical Oppositions and Antonymies in Sanāei's Poetry. Research on Mystical Literature, 7(2), 141-158. [In Persian]
32. Culler, Jonathan (2002). Structuralist Poetics. translated by Kourosh Safavi, Tehrān: Minouy-e Kherad. [In Persian]
33. Ghorbāni Cherāghtappeh, A. (2022). Binary Oppositions in Persian Sufi Prose Texts by 13th century. Ph.D. Dessrtation. Khārazmi University. Tehran. Iran. [In Persian]
34. Hayāti Z. A (2009) Semiotic Survey of Bilateral Elements as a Portrayal in Rumi's Poetry. LCQ. Vol. 2 (6): 7-24. [In Persian]
35. Makaryk, Irena Rima (1993). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory (Approaches, Schools, Terms). translated by Mehrān Mohājer and Mohammad Nabavi, Tehrān: Āgah. [In Persian] [DOI:10.3138/9781442674417]
36. Mohammadi, A. (2017). Binary Oppsitions in Rostam and Sohrāb Story. Teaching Persian Language and Literature. Vol. 30 No. 3: 73-75. [In Persian]
37. Nabilou, A R. (2013). Evaluation of the Binary Oppositions in the Ghazals of Hafiz. Persian Language and Literature of Kharazmi University; 21 (74) :69-91. [In Persian]
38. Noya, Paul (1970). Exegese Coranique et Langage Mystique. translated by Esmāyil Saādat, Tehrān: Markaz-e Nashr-e Dāneshgahi. [In Persian]
39. Rowhani, M. and Enayati, M. (2017). Binary Oppositions in the Lyrics of Attar Neishabouri. Persian Language and Literature of Kharazmi University; 24 (81) :201-221. [In Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jpll.24.81.201]
40. Shanbeyi, R. (2011). Determinism and Free Will based on Binary Opposition in Personal Style of Sa'di. Dehkhoda. Vol. 2, No.8: 194-212. [In Persian]
41. Sharifnasab M. (2015). Double Contrasts in Folk Stories. Culture and Folk Literature; 3 (6) :1-21. [In Persian]
42. Webster, R. (1994). Jaque Derrida and Deconstruction of text. Arghanoon. Vol.1. No.4: 251-256. [In Persian]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
sarli N, Ghorbani Cheraghtappeh A. Deconstructing and going far beyond the binary oppositions in Sufi texts (data from Persian prose books). Persian Language and Literature 2023; 31 (94) :189-208
URL: http://jpll.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4319-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 31, Issue 94 (6-2023) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه خوارزمی Half-Yearly Persian Language and Literature
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666