Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Comparative Study

Behrouz Mohamadrezapour, Hassan Heidari,
Volume 0, Issue 0 (3-1921)
Abstract

In recent decades, environmental crises have become one of the fundamental challenges for developing countries, and the need to adopt coordinated and regional policies to address these crises has become increasingly evident. Iran and the Arab League member states possess significant capacity for environmental cooperation due to their geographical, climatic, and economic similarities. However, differences in their environmental policies and practices necessitate a careful comparative study. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the environmental policies of Iran and eight selected Arab League countries (Egypt, Algeria, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait), with an emphasis on responsible regionalism and its impact on sustainable development. For this purpose, official UN data for two points in time, 2020 and 2024, were used as the basis for the analysis, and 31 key indicators were extracted within three dimensions: environmental, social, and economic. The research method is mixed, combining quantitative analysis (using Shannon entropy to weight indicators and the TOPSIS model to rank countries) with qualitative library research. The findings are presented in three stages: first, an assessment of environmental policies in 2020; second, a review of developments up to 2024; and third, an analysis of indicator trends in Iran and the eight selected Arab League countries. The results show that, based on the TOPSIS model, Iran ranked fifth among the countries studied in 2020 with a Ci value of 0.339, and second in 2024 with a Ci value of 0.452, representing the most significant development advancement with a three-rank improvement. This advancement was associated with increases in the weight of certain social (such as managed drinking water), economic (such as GDP per capita), and infrastructure indicators, although challenges such as rising greenhouse gas emissions and biological threats persist. The study highlights the need to strengthen environmental policies and design regional cooperation mechanisms to achieve sustainable development.

Maryam Sanatgar Kakhaki, -Manouchehr Foroutan, Mohammad Mehdi Soroush, Sara Jalalian,
Volume 24, Issue 73 (6-2024)
Abstract


Vitality is one of the main components in design, but it is a complex and multifaceted concept that overlaps in its physical, social and economic dimensions. Therefore, in this paper, according to the theoretical vacuum of this concept in architecture and considering its interdisciplinary nature, using the model of various types of communication and types of vitality, the fields of psychology and sociology were selected for comparative study of vitality. Then, by using the comparative method by juxtaposing the differences and similarities of vitality in the field of psychology and sociology with definitions in architecture and urban planning, as well as examining the difference between vitality and other similar concepts in architecture and urban planning, including quality. Life, viability, and sustainability were ultimately represented by the definition of vitality and the model of environmental vitality. Therefore, the present study was performed with interpretive paradigm, qualitative approach, comparative method and logic of deductive reasoning, which is explained in terms of theoretical purpose and type of results. The purpose of this study is to answer questions about the definition of environmental vitality, the appropriate approach to research on vitality, the appropriate scale of vitality research, the factors affecting environmental vitality and its evaluation methods.
 
Key word: Happiness, social vitality, comparative study, environmental vitality
 
[1] The results of this study show that environmental vitality is a relative concept of place and time that cannot be specifically defined for the vitality of all places in all countries and in all time periods, but rather Factors must be identified locally according to location. Factors affecting environmental vitality in general include experimental and aesthetic, functional and environmental components. The impact of each factor varies according to the culture and local characteristics of the place, which is due to the collectivist culture. And the place of collective happiness in our country, paying attention to the factors of vitality that increase the social aspects of space, attracting and involving people, can be a way forward.
 


Page 1 from 1     

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)