Marly rocks of Abtalkh formation were classified by Q, RMR, RSR and RQD rock mass classification systems using 222 meters logs from exploratory boreholes in Doosti dam site. The results show that the RMR is the most suitable method for classification of studied rock masses and has highest correlation coefficient with RQD. The validity of different Q-RMR equations was studied using error ratio (ER). Cameron et al. (1981) and Morno (1982) equations have lowest ER and highest validity for studied marlstones. Bieniawski (1989) and Cameron (1981) relationships are lower and higher limits of equations for marly rocks respectively.
Soil classification is one of the major parts of geotechnical studies. So assessment of existing methods for soil classification in different areas is important. For soil classification is used in situ and laboratory test results. Sampling and identification tests are laboratory methods for soil classification. CPTu test is in situ method for soil identification and classification, due to accuracy and speed, this test is used widely in geotechnical study today. Many researchers are proposed some charts for soil classifications based on the parameters measured in CPTu test. In this paper for evaluation the performance of these methods, 58 CPTu test results have been used. These tests are related to four areas in southern Iran. The soils are classified by CPTu methods and then they are compared with 372 laboratory soil classification. Research results show the chart proposed by Robertson (1990) which based on Qt, Ft and Bq variables has the best adaptation with the laboratory soil classification in these studied areas. Then according to data obtained from research, proposed a modified charts based on Rf, qt-u0/σ΄ v , that show 90% adaptation with laboratory soil classification.
Objective or result | Title | Step |
Identifying the general geological characteristics | General geological investigation of the considered region | 1 |
Determining the rock units and soil layers as well as their outcrops and investigating their appearance | Determining the appearance of the layers through field investigations | 2 |
Determining the layer types and drawing the longitudinal and lateral profiles | Identifying subsurface layers | 3 |
Determining the characteristics of geological units and their origin of emergence | Geological classification based on the steps involved in formation of units | 4 |
a)Collecting the available information, b) controlling the available information, c) completing the information | Determining the geotechnical attributes of geological units | 5 |
a) Presenting geological-geotechnical classification, b) presenting geological identification criteria to determine the type of a given unit at the site of the project | Presenting a geological-geotechnical classification for the considered region | 6 |
Page 1 from 1 |
© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Engineering Geology
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb