|
|
|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 1 results for Academic Integrity
Dr. Reza Nejati, Dr. Mavadat Saidi,
Volume 28, Issue 1 (4-2025)
Abstract
effectiveness, however, challenges such as academic dishonesty remain significant concerns. Un-proctored online assessments, especially multiple-choice exams, are particularly vulnerable to cheating and plagiarism, threatening the integrity of student evaluation. While numerous strategies have been proposed to mitigate cheating, the effectiveness of specific measures in un-proctored settings remains underexplored. This study investigates the impact of several anti-cheating strategies on un-proctored online multiple-choice exams administered through Moodle. Strategies tested included fixed time limits, limited exam availability,restriction on backtracking, and auto-submit on time expiration. The TOEFL reading section was administered to 608 students to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. Results showed a Variance-Covariance Matrix value of +0.386 and a -2log likelihood of +37.913.919, indicating validity for the sample and effective mitigation of cheating. Item and person reliability analysis revealed that fewer than 4% of participants exceeded the outfit index of 1.2, suggesting minimal instances of random guessing or dishonesty. This research contributes to the growing body of literature by providing empirical evidence on the effectiveness of specific anti-cheating measures in un-proctored online assessments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publisher
