1. Ahmad, U. K. (1997). Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 273–304). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [DOI:10.1515/9783110821048.273]

2. Arvay, A., & Tanko, G. (2004). A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian theoretical research article introductions. IRAL, 24 (1), 71-100. Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes, 16(3), 313–319.

3. Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4–18. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002]

4. Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 79-97. [DOI:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201]

5. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Harlow: Pearson.

6. Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of Ph.D. conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 207-224. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004]

7. Carrió-Pastor, M. (2009). Contrasting specific English corpora: Language variation. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 221–234.

8. Carrió-Pastor, M. (2013). A contrastive study of the variation of sentence connectors in academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(3), 192–202. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.04.002]

9. Cmejrkova, S. (1996). Academic writing in Czech and English. In E. Ventola, & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues (pp. 137-152). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [DOI:10.1075/pbns.41.11cme]

10. Coker, W., & Coker, W. (2012). Stating the research problem: A genre-based study of English language M.Phil. theses in a Ghanaian Public University. LANGUAGE IN INDIA, 12, 509-518.

11. Connor, U. (2008). Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric, In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout, & W. V. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [DOI:10.1075/pbns.169.19con]

12. Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of postgraduate students at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121-123.

13. Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native speaker graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 369-390. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9]

14. Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of M.Sc. dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.

15. Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge.

16. Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Common core and specific approach to the teaching of academic writing. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language (pp. 293-312). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

17. Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 291-313. [DOI:10.1016/0378-2166(94)90003-5]

18. Duszak, A. (1997a). Cross-cultural academic communication: A Discourse-community view. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 11-39). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [DOI:10.1515/9783110821048.11]

19. Duszak, A. (1997b). Introduction. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp.1-8). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [DOI:10.1515/9783110821048.1]

20. Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11, 17-33. [DOI:10.28945/438]

21. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Academic Discourse, London: Longman.

22. Halleck, G. B., & Connor, U. M. (2006). Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 70-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001]

23. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1990). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

24. Hewings, M. (1993). The end! How to conclude a dissertation. In G., Blue (Ed.), Language, learning and success: Studying through English. Review of English language teaching (pp. 105-112). London: Macmillan.

25. Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 240–250. [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001]

26. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27. Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal, 56, 351‐358. [DOI:10.1093/elt/56.4.351]

28. Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates' gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303–324. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00051-6]

29. Ibrahim, N., &Nambiar, M.K. (2011). What is the problem with the statement of problem? the case of postgraduate international students and the introductory sections of a project paper. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1713–1717. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.356]

30. Jalilifar, A. R., Firuzmand, S., & Roshani, S. (2011). Genre analysis of problem statement sections of M.A proposals and theses in Applied Linguistics. Language, Society and Culture, 33, 85-93.

31. Jenkins, S., Jordan, M. K., & Weiland, P. O. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: A survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 51-67. [DOI:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90027-L]

32. Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x]

33. Koutlaki, S. A. (2002). Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: Ta'arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1733-1756. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00055-8]

34. Kwan, B.S.C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001]

35. Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

36. Mauranen, A. (2013a). Lingua franca discourse in academic contexts: Shaped by complexity. In John Flowerdew (Ed.), Discourse in context: Contemporary applied linguistics (pp. 225–245). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

37. Moreno, A. I. (1997). Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 161-179. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00023-3]

38. Najjar, H. Y. (1989). Scientific Arabic: The agricultural research article. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan).

39. Paltridge, B. (2004). The exegesis as a genre: An ethnographic examination. In Ravelli, L and Ellis, A (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Conceptualized Frameworks, (pp. 84-103). London: Continuum.

40. Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17. [DOI:10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5]

41. Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005]

42. Samraj, B.& Monk, L. (2008). The statement of purpose in graduate program applications: Genre structure and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 193–211. [DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.001]

43. Sayfouri, N. (2010). SFL and ESP genre analysis of English research articles in Iranian and English-American medical journals: A contrastive study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran). Retrieved from http://www.isfla.org/Systemics.

44. Shehzad, W. (2008). Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25–50.

45. Sheldon, E. (2013). The research article: A rhetorical and functional comparison of texts created by native and non-native English writers and native Spanish writers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology). Retrieved from httpa.org/Systemics/Print/Theses.

46. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

47. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524827]

48. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

49. Taylor, G., & Tingguang, C. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319-336. [DOI:10.1093/applin/12.3.319]

50. Thompson, P. (1999). Exploring the contexts of writing: Interviews with Ph.D. supervisors. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction (pp. 37-54): Reading, UK: CALS.