Volume 7, Issue 3 (12-2020)
Human Information Interaction 2020, 7(3): 66-77 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tavosi M, Naghshineh N. Participation of researchers affiliated with top Times universities in the ResearchGate network: A comparative study of Iranian and international researchers. Human Information Interaction 2020; 7 (3)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2944-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2944-en.html
University of Tehran
Abstract: (4188 Views)
Purpose: This is an applied research, with the aim of a comparative study of the presence and participation of Iranian and international researchers affiliated with the top scientific centers (Times Ranking 2020), in the Research Gate research network. Altimetric indicators, such as "RG score", "Reads", "number of registrations" and "number of research items" were considered.
Methodology: Survey performed with altimetric approach and analytical method. Sample of top 10 universities in Iran and 10 scientific centers around the world by Times Ranking performance index of education, research, knowledge transfer, and international perspective done. First, a comparative study of the activities of Iranian researchers with one another, then of international researchers completed separately. Lastly, an analysis of the differences in performance amongst these two groups was performed by "Libre Office Calc" software.
Findings: Among Times top 10 international scientific institutes, the indicators of "number of registrations," "RG-score per member," "number of publications per member" and "reads" the highest rates were observed in researchers at Cambridge University in London, the California research center, and the California research center at Oxford university, respectively. Among the top 10 Universities in Iran, the indicators of "number of registrations," "RPG score per media member," "number of research copies per member" and "reading rate of research copies, "among the researchers with organizational affiliation to the Amir Kabir University of technology, Tehran University of medical sciences, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran university of medical sciences, the highest amount was observed. The total "average score per member" at the international level was 8.4 and at the Iranian level was 5.1. The "average reads" index for the top 10 universities or research institutes at the international level was 154990.2. The figure was obtained for the top 10 universities in Iran, 22736.1.
Conclusion: Researchers affiliated with top universities in Iran, compared to their international counterparts, have a stronger social interaction in terms of indicators of ResearchGate in activities such as "enquiring," "answering questions" and "suggestion." Although the difference between the number of research items shared internationally is more than 3 times that of Iran, but the average RG score is not seen 3 times that of Iran globally. So, the high RG score is not related to the number of research items on the ResearchGate. Also, comparative study on the presence and activities of researchers affiliated with Times top Universities in Iran and internationally could lead to better future.
Methodology: Survey performed with altimetric approach and analytical method. Sample of top 10 universities in Iran and 10 scientific centers around the world by Times Ranking performance index of education, research, knowledge transfer, and international perspective done. First, a comparative study of the activities of Iranian researchers with one another, then of international researchers completed separately. Lastly, an analysis of the differences in performance amongst these two groups was performed by "Libre Office Calc" software.
Findings: Among Times top 10 international scientific institutes, the indicators of "number of registrations," "RG-score per member," "number of publications per member" and "reads" the highest rates were observed in researchers at Cambridge University in London, the California research center, and the California research center at Oxford university, respectively. Among the top 10 Universities in Iran, the indicators of "number of registrations," "RPG score per media member," "number of research copies per member" and "reading rate of research copies, "among the researchers with organizational affiliation to the Amir Kabir University of technology, Tehran University of medical sciences, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran university of medical sciences, the highest amount was observed. The total "average score per member" at the international level was 8.4 and at the Iranian level was 5.1. The "average reads" index for the top 10 universities or research institutes at the international level was 154990.2. The figure was obtained for the top 10 universities in Iran, 22736.1.
Conclusion: Researchers affiliated with top universities in Iran, compared to their international counterparts, have a stronger social interaction in terms of indicators of ResearchGate in activities such as "enquiring," "answering questions" and "suggestion." Although the difference between the number of research items shared internationally is more than 3 times that of Iran, but the average RG score is not seen 3 times that of Iran globally. So, the high RG score is not related to the number of research items on the ResearchGate. Also, comparative study on the presence and activities of researchers affiliated with Times top Universities in Iran and internationally could lead to better future.
Keywords: ResearchGate, Best Universities, RG, Indicators, TimesHigherEducation, Activities, Academic Social Network
References
1. ALi, M Y., & Richardson, J. (2017). Pakistani LIS scholars' altmetrics in ResearchGate. Program: electronic library and information system, 51(2): 152-169. [DOI:10.1108/PROG-07-2016-0052]
2. Asmi, N A., & Margam, M. (2018). Academic social network sites for researchers in central university of Delhi: A study of Researchgate and Academia. Global knowledge memory and communication, 67(1/2):91-108. [DOI:10.1108/GKMC-01-2017-0004]
3. Asnafi, A R., & Rahmani, M. (2017). Utilizing ResearchGate social network by Iranian. Library Philosophy and Practice (e- journal).
4. Asnafi, A R. (2015). Reviewing Shahid Beheshti University Scholars' Presence in ResearchGate. Human Information Interaction, 2 (3). [in Persian]
5. Copiello, S., & Bonifaci, P. A. few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation. Scientometrics 2017; 114(1): 301-306. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9]
6. Doulani, A., Zand, S., & Bradar, R. (2020). Title: Investigating the activities of the Faculty members of Alzahra University in the Scientific Social Network of Researchgate and its impact on the Scopus Citation Database and the Google Scholar Search Engine. Knowledge Studies, 6(21), 43-69. [in Persian].
7. Fortney, K., & Gonder, J. (2015). A social networking site is not an open access repository. Office of Scholarly Communication.
8. Lee, J., Oh, S., Dong, H., Wang, F., & Burnett, G (2019). Motivations for self archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on researchgate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,70(6): 563-574. [DOI:10.1002/asi.24138]
9. Liu, X. Z., & Fang H. (2018).Which Academic Papers Do Researchers Tend to Feature on ResearchGate?.Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 23 (1):11-22.
10. Memar, N., Baji, F., & Hosseinizadeh, F. (2018). Surveying the relationship between use of the ResearchGate network and social capital of faculty members of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science (J.SLIS) , 10(23):15-26.[in Persian].
11. Naderbeigi, F., & Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., & Soheili, F. (2018). Scientific Activities Profile of Researchers in Islamic Azad University- Tehran Science and Research Branch in "ResearchGate. Quarterly Journal of Knowledge and Information Management, 4(1):11-22. [in Persian].
12. Nicholas, D., Clark, D., & Herman, E. ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing 2016; 29(3): 173-182 [DOI:10.1002/leap.1035]
13. Rahmani, M., Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Asnafi, A. R.(2018). Expectations of engineering researchers in University of Tehran from ResearchGate as an academic social network, 33 (2) :707-726. http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-3389-fa.html [in Persian].
14. Researchgate. Help Center. Retrieved 30 May 2020 from https://explore.researchgate.net/display/support/Signing+up+for+ResearchGate
15. Rezaeian, M. (2017). How Would it be Possible to Increase the Visibility of a Published Article?. JRUMS, 15 (9) :893-898. [in persian].
16. Siamaki, S., Geraei, E., & Zare-Farashbandi, F. (2016). A Survey on the Presence of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Researchers in ResearchGate Network: An Altmetrics Study. Health Inf Manage; 13(5): 341-6. [in Persian].
17. Singson, M. A., & Amees, M. (2017). Use of ResearchGate by research Scholars of Pondicherry university: A Study.Journal of Library and Information Technology, 37(5):366-371. [DOI:10.14429/djlit.37.5.11139]
18. Verma. S., & MargamM. (2018). A study of researchgate profiles of Medical science Department of University of Delhi. Challenges and Pitfall of Technology. pp. 951-966.
19. YaghoubiMalal, N., Jamali Mahmoei, H., & Mansourian, Y. (2016). Motivations and Information Interactions of Scientists in Re-earchGate. Scientometrics Research Journal, 2(3), 43-56.doi: 10.22070/rsci.2016.468. [in Persian].
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
