Volume 8, Issue 2 (9-2021)
Human Information Interaction 2021, 8(2): 25-37 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hoseinpour M, Salajghe S, Jalal Kamali M. Inquiring the Effective Factors of Environmental, Technical and Technological on Knowledge Hiding in Scientific Space. Human Information Interaction 2021; 8 (2)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2936-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2936-en.html
Islamic Azad University of Kerman
Abstract: (3434 Views)
Background and Aim: The aim of present study is the inquiring the environmental, technical and technological factors effective on knowledge hiding in scientific space.
Methods: The study is a mixed approach, inquiring the environmental, technical and technological factors effective on knowledge hiding in scientific space. Thus, this article include in the pluralism of information collection methods. Also, using the "Delphi" method, the conceptual model of Inquiring the environmental, technical and technological factors effective on knowledge hiding in scientific space.
In quantitative terms, the sample was 314 employees of Islamic Azad University of Khorasan Razavi. Sample selected randomly and surveyed through standard knowledge hiding (Demirkasimoglu, 2016) and researcher-made environmental, technical and technological factors questionnaires. Data was collected during the first six months of 2020 and analyzed, using SEM and Amos software. Technical and technological factors include: Ease of accessibility, compliance of the organization's technology, fear of working with the existing technology in the organization and satisfaction with quality, and for environmental factors, the physical environment and social environment were considered.
Results: Results show that the effect of physical and social environment on knowledge concealment with the standard coefficients of -0.70 and -0.39, respectively. Also, the amount of effectiveness of ease of accessibility, the factor of compliance with the organization's technology, the factor of fear and apprehension of working with existing technology in the organization, the factor of quality satisfaction with knowledge concealment are equal to -0.65, -0.21 and – 0.45. But the fear variable has a direct effect of 0.96 by hiding knowledge.
Conclusion: Results indicate that: Environmental, technical and technological factors are inversely and significantly related to knowledge hiding.
Methods: The study is a mixed approach, inquiring the environmental, technical and technological factors effective on knowledge hiding in scientific space. Thus, this article include in the pluralism of information collection methods. Also, using the "Delphi" method, the conceptual model of Inquiring the environmental, technical and technological factors effective on knowledge hiding in scientific space.
In quantitative terms, the sample was 314 employees of Islamic Azad University of Khorasan Razavi. Sample selected randomly and surveyed through standard knowledge hiding (Demirkasimoglu, 2016) and researcher-made environmental, technical and technological factors questionnaires. Data was collected during the first six months of 2020 and analyzed, using SEM and Amos software. Technical and technological factors include: Ease of accessibility, compliance of the organization's technology, fear of working with the existing technology in the organization and satisfaction with quality, and for environmental factors, the physical environment and social environment were considered.
Results: Results show that the effect of physical and social environment on knowledge concealment with the standard coefficients of -0.70 and -0.39, respectively. Also, the amount of effectiveness of ease of accessibility, the factor of compliance with the organization's technology, the factor of fear and apprehension of working with existing technology in the organization, the factor of quality satisfaction with knowledge concealment are equal to -0.65, -0.21 and – 0.45. But the fear variable has a direct effect of 0.96 by hiding knowledge.
Conclusion: Results indicate that: Environmental, technical and technological factors are inversely and significantly related to knowledge hiding.
Keywords: Knowledge Hiding, Environmental Factors, Technical and Technological, Scientific Space, Islamic Azad University of Khorasan Razavi
References
1. Ahmadi, R. (2018). Factors Influencing Knowledge Hiding Behavi. Master Disertation in Information Technology Management- Knowledge Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Accounting and Management. (In Persian)
2. Burmeister, Anne, Gerpott, Fabiola, Fasbender, Ulrike. (2018). Consequences of Knowledge Hiding: An Emotion-based Reparatory Mechanism. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2018 (1). DOI: 0.5465/AMBPP.2018.11763abstract. [DOI:10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11763abstract]
3. Bari, M, Abrar, M, Shaheen, S, Bashir, M, Fanchen, M. (2019). Knowledge Hiding Behaviors and Team Creativity: The Contingent Role of Perceived Mastery Motivational Climate. Original Research Journal. No2. [DOI:10.1177/2158244019876297]
4. Bazarghan, A. (2008). Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods: Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences, Didar publication. (In Persian)
5. Černe, M. Nerstad, C. G. Dysvik, A. & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 172-192. [DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0122]
6. Chul, W. M. (1998). Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 9 (1): 35-53. [DOI:10.1016/1047-8310(88)90004-1]
7. Connelly Catherin E. David Zweig Jan Webster, Trougakos J. P. (2011). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, Vol. 33, pp. 64-88. [DOI:10.1002/job.737]
8. Damgard, I, Buus, N, J, Wiels, D. (2008). Isolated proofs of knowledge and isolated zero knowledge. Annual International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Eurocrypt. 509-526. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_29]
9. Dargahi, H, Dastafkan, A. (2017). A study of the relationship between organizational culture and individual knowledge hiding among clinical laboratories of the hospitals in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Laboratory and Diagnosis.9(35): 24-39. (In Persian)
10. Demirkasimoglu N. (2016).Knowledge hiding in Academia: is personality a key factor? International Journal of Higher Education. 5(1): 1-13. [DOI:10.5430/ijhe.v5n1p128]
11. Ford, DP, Chen, YE. (2003). Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting: a case study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 1(1): 11-27. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8499999]
12. Ghanbarinejad, M, Mohammadi, A. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Technology Management and Research and Development (Comprehensive Innovation Management) on Organizational Performance in terms of Innovation and Quality. Journal of Innovation in the Humanities. Vol 2, Number 2, Pages 1. (In Persian)
13. Gholipur, A, Labafi, S. (2016). How is the underlying model of knowledge concealment presented? In software development companies. Journal of Human Resource Management Research. Volume 5, Number 1. (In Persian)
14. He, H. Baruch, Y. & Lin, C.P. (2014). Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition. Human relations, 67(8), 947- 978. [DOI:10.1177/0018726713508797]
15. Hislop D. (2002). "Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology"; Journal of Information Technology, 17, pp.165-177. [DOI:10.1080/02683960210161230]
16. Kamreie, M, Hasanzadeh, A. (2016). What are the factors affecting the secrecy in the knowledge organization? Second International Conference Accounting and Management with Modern Applied and Research Approaches. (In Persian)
17. Katja, Babič, Matej, Černe, Miha, Škerlavaj, Pengcheng, Zhang. (2018). The interplay among prosocial motivation, cultural tightness, and uncertainty avoidance in predicting knowledge hiding, Economic and business review, 20(3): 395-422. [DOI:10.15458/85451.71]
18. Malik,O, M, Shahzad,A Raziq, Khan, M Yusaf,S Khan, A. (2018). Perceptions of organizational politics, knowledge hiding, and employee creativity: The moderating role of professional commitment. Journal Personality and Individual Differences.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.005.]
19. Sahoo, T. Banwet, D. K. and Momaya, K. (2011). Strategic technology management in the auto component industry in India: A case study of select organizations. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 8(1): 9-29. [DOI:10.1108/09727981111129282]
20. Salehnia, M, Ahmadzadehjazi, M. (2013). The Influence of the Physical Environment of the Hospital on its Mental Imagery: A Customer Viewpoint. Journal of Hakim Research. Volume 15, Number 14, pp. 321. (In Persian)
21. Takala T. Urpilainen J. (1991). "Managerial work and lying: A conceptual framework and an explorative case study"; Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 181-195 Saxe, L. [DOI:10.1023/A:1006089527770]
22. Webster J, Brawn G, Zwely D, Connelly CE, Brodt S, Sitkin S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: withholding knowledge at work. Personnel and Human Resource Management; 27: 1-37. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-7301(08)27001-5]
23. Zhao, Hongdan, Qingxia, He, Peixu, Sheard, A. Wan, Pei. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 59. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009---------]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
