Volume 9, Issue 43 (12-2021)
2021, __(43): 19-50 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
School-based management at the level of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal title 2021; 9 (43) : 2
URL: http://erj.khu.ac.ir/article-1-978-en.html
URL: http://erj.khu.ac.ir/article-1-978-en.html
Abstract: (10474 Views)
The main purpose of this study was to identify the important and basic components of school-based management at the level of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The method of the present research is qualitative in the method of content analysis with the method of Atreid Snerling. Semi-structured interviews were used to obtain information and a brief description of the experiences and perceptions of specialists, experts and presenters. In this study, the three-way strategy was used comprehensively and accurately, and in order to conduct a semi-structured interview, the purposeful sampling method "key people approach" was used and sampling with the "snowball" method was continued until theoretical saturation. In this regard, with 23 professors from universities and higher education centers in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad provinces in 1399, researchers in the field of educational sciences and experienced principals of primary schools and principals of high schools and vocational schools with doctoral and master's degrees (15 people) PhDs and 8 masters) were in related fields. Interviews were conducted to allow the research to evolve as much as possible. Validation of this study was considered as a qualitative paradigm based on four criteria: reliability (reliability), neutrality (verifiability), reliability (compatibility), and applicability (portability). Based on the research findings, for the comprehensive theme (school-based management at the level of the Islamic Republic of Iran), eleven organizing themes under the headings: Democratic approach of the headquarters (ministry), participation, strategic organizations, school perspective, student perspective, honoring Employees, professionalism and specialization, role of parents, role of organizations, institutions, etc., computability and comprehensive monitoring, and deviations and deviations and the number of sixty-two basic themes were identified.
Article number: 2
Type of Study: Research Paper |
Subject:
Educational Science
Received: 2021/03/27 | Revised: 2023/08/26 | Accepted: 2021/10/31 | ePublished: 2021/11/9
Received: 2021/03/27 | Revised: 2023/08/26 | Accepted: 2021/10/31 | ePublished: 2021/11/9
References
1. Adam, E., & Miran, N, M. (2010). School-based management and effect on teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in education. Vol 5, No .4.
2. Adam E: Nir, Meir. (2006). the guilty consequences of school-based manageme International management, 20(2), 116-26. [DOI:10.1108/09513540610646109]
3. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405. [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307]
4. Bandur, A. (2012) Decentralization and school-based management in decision making a matter of context? The leadership and organization development Journal.
5. Barley, M, C. (2013). Perspectives of School-based Assessment in The NSS Curriculum through The Eyes of The Administrative and Teaching Stakeholders in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Teachers' Centre Journal, 12: 21-4.
6. Biberman-Shalev, Liat, Tur, Gemma: Buchem, Hona (2020). "Culture Identity and Learning: a Mediation Model in the Context of Biogging in Teacher Education". Open Praaxis, v12 n1 p51 - 65 Jan-Mar 2020. [DOI:10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.995]
7. Bontism N. (1998). International capital: An explanatory study that develop measures and models. Management decision. 36(2): 63-76. [DOI:10.1108/00251749810204142]
8. Brauan, V. & Clarke, (2006), "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 2, Pp. 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
9. Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management Educational Polhcy Series. Paris UNESCO/ International Institute for Educational planning and International Academy of Education.
10. Candal. C. S. (2009). School-based management a partical path to school district reform publi policy Research.
11. Chan, D, & Tee Ng, P. (2008). A comparatives study of Singapore's school excellence model with Hong Cong's school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management. [DOI:10.1108/09513540810895426]
12. Cotton, Katleen. (1997). "Schook-Based Management, School improvement, Reseeach Serics (SIRS0)." Delawars Education Research and Development Center.
13. Cary, David; Macy, Ruth; Mittelman, Robert (2019). "Teaching in Iran: Culture and Consequences". International Education, v30 n4 p429-444 2019. [DOI:10.1080/14675986.2018.1540109]
14. Daft, R. (2014).Translators Ali Parsaiyan, Seyed Mohammad Arabi. Publisher: Cultural Research Office. Number of pages: 664. Dewey Classification: 658.1 ISBN 13 digits: 9789646269200.
15. Davis. K., & Newstorm, J. (1999). Behavior at Work (Organizational Behavior). Creator of Tusi translator, Mohammad Ali. 1 222 15 RBF222 1. ، 12794 1 CBF12794
16. Day, C., GU, Q., & Sammon, P. (2016). The impact of Leadership on student outcomes: How successful school Leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258. [DOI:10.1177/0013161X15616863]
17. Dimmock. C. (2013). School-based management and school effectiveness. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315824727]
18. Durkheim, Emile (1985). Education Sociologie. Paris. PUF.
19. Edgar. H. S. (2004). Organizational Culture. Translator: Mohamad Ali Mahjob. Tehran: For Publication. Dewey Classification 658/406. National Bibliography Number 2150-83.
20. Facilation of critical thinking and deep cognitive processing by structured discussion board activitaties. (2006). Re trieved from: htt://www.celt.su.Edu.
21. Gamage, David. T, sipple petter & partridge, peter. (1996). "Research on School-Based Management in Victoria," Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 34:1. [DOI:10.1108/09578239610107147]
22. Gonzalez, D. Alyssa, R., Williams P., Don, H. (2005). "Examinaning the relationship between parental Involvement and Student Motivation", Educational Psychologe Review, Vol 17, No2. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-005-3949-7]
23. Han, S. W. (2018). School-Based teacher hiring and achievement inequality: A comparative perspective International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 82-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.004.]
24. Halfman, Jordi (2020). "An Educated Sint Maartener? National Belonging in Primary School on Sint Maarten". Globalisation. Societies and Education. V18 n3 p290 - 302 2020. [DOI:10.1080/14767724.2019.1662280]
25. Harris, A. & Jones, M. (2019) Teacher leadership and educational change. School leadership & Management. 39(2), 123-126. [DOI:10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964]
26. Hofstede, G. (1980 a). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related Values, Beverly Hillis, and CA: sage.
27. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizaational Across Nations, Second ed Sage Publications.
28. Haci Huseyin, Tasar. (2018). "The Analysis of Articles and Thesis Published on School-Based Management in Turkey". Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, v13 n3 p319-327. [DOI:10.18844/cjes.v13i3.3589]
29. Koc, A., & Bastas, M. (2019). The evaluation of the progect school model in terms of organizational and its effect on teachers' organizational commitment. Sustainability. // (13) .3349.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133549 [DOI:10.3390/su11133549.]
30. Lindquist, K.M. (1995). "Sghool-Based Management doomed to failure" Education and Urban socity.
31. Law, E. Maurice Galton and Sally Wan. (2010). Distributed Curriculum Leadership in Action: AHong Kong Case study Educational Management, Administration & Leardship [DOI:10.1177/1741143209359714]
32. Lu Y,-L, & Lin Y.-C. (2016). How to identify effective school in the New Period: Use the fuzzy correlation coefficient of distributed leadership and school effectiveness International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applhed Statistics, 9(4), 347-359.https://doi. Org / 10. 6148/IJITAS.2016.0904.06.
33. Mello, J. A. (2002). Strategis Human Resource Management. Southwestern: Thomson Learning, 274-275.
34. Moreira, Ana Maria de Albuquerque; Rocha, Maria Zelia Borba (2018). "To understand the Brazilian Way of School Management: How National Cultuer Influences the Organizational Culture and School Leadership". Education Sciences, v8 Article 88. MDPI AG. Klybeakstrass 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. Tel: e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; web site: http//www.md pi.com. [DOI:10.3390/educsci8020088]
35. Okitsu. T., & Edwards, D. B. (2017). Policy promis and the reality of community involvemen in school-based management in Zambia: can the rural poor hold schools and teacher to accont international Journal of Educational Development, 56, 2841. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.07.001]
36. Patton, M. Q. (1997); Utilization-Focused Evaluation; 3rd. London: Sage.
37. Postholm, May Brit; Waege, Kjersti (2016) "Teachers' Learning in School -Based Development". Educational Research Journal.v58 n1 p24-38. [DOI:10.1080/00131881.2015.1117350]
38. Preston, C., Goldring, E., Guthric, J. E., Ramsay, R., & Huff. J. (2017). Conceptualizing Essential Components of Effective High Schools. Leadership and Polhcy in Schools, 6(4), 525-562.10.1080/15700763.2016.120519. Pundy Pillay. (2004). Governace and Management in education samelessons from the international Experience Workshop for School Masters: Tehran, Iran.
10.1080/15700763.2016.1205198 []
39. Ramberg, J., Brolin, S., Eransson, E., & Modin, B. (2019). Effectiveness and truancy: A multilevel study of secondary schools in Stockholm. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24 (2), 185-198. [DOI:10.1080/02673843.2018.1503085]
40. Valley G., Daud, K. (2015). Implementation of school-based management policy: An exploration. Procedia social and Behavioral Sciences, 172(1) , 693 -700. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.421]
41. Vally. G., Vallamah. S., & Daudb, K. (2015). The implementation of school-based management policy: An exploroation. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 693-700. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.421]
42. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review. 15, 17-40, [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002]
43. Van Waes. S., Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Heldens, H. H. P. P., Donche, V., Van Petegem. P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016). The networked instractor: The quality of networks in diferent stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 295-308. 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.022. Yasin, B., & Yusuf, Y.Q. (2014). The Policy outcomes and feasibility of Development (APJED), 3(1), 21-32.
10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.022 []
44. Santiban-ez. L., Abreu-Lastra, R., & O'Donoghue, L. (2014). School-Based Management effects: Resources change? Evidence from Mexico Economics of Education Review, 39, 97-109. [DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.11.008]
45. Sawada, Y., Aida, T., & Griffen. A. S. (2015). Election, implementation, and social capital in school-based management: Evidence from a randomized field experiment of COGES progect in Burkina Faso.
46. Saxton, E., Belangerb, S., & Becker. W. (2012). The Critical thinking analytic rubric (CTAR): Investigaying intra inter rebliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments Assessing Writing, 17, 251-270. [DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.002]
47. Scheau, I. (2012). The infiuence of critical thinking on puplis development and at the level of didactic activities Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 752-756 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.235]
48. Sharratt. L. (2019). CLARITY: what matters most in learning, teaching, and leading.Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin?
49. Sternberg. R. (2007). Creativity as habit. Creativity: A handbook for teachers, 3-25. [DOI:10.1142/9789812770868_0001]
50. Stuffelebeam, D. L. and W. J. Webster (1989); "Evaluation as an Administrative Function", in N. J. Boyan (Ed), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration; London: Longman: 569-601.
51. Stokke. H. E. (2008). Productivity growth and organizational learning Revieew of Development Economics. 12(4): 764-778.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
