SPACE ECONOMY & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

fa ارزیابی عملکرد نهادها و سازمان های مرتبط با پایداری روستاها مورد: بخش دهدز در شهرستان ایذه Evaluating the performance of institutions and organizations related to rural sustainability Case: Dehdez district in Izeh County تخصصي Special پژوهشي Research <p dir="RTL" style="text-align: justify; "><strong>امروزه روستاها بخش مهمی از توسعه یک کشور را بر عهده‌دارند که بایستی همانند نقاط شهری به آن‌ها توجه و نگاه خاص شود. این توجه خاص مرهون عملکرد مناسب نهادها و سازمان‌های مرتبط با نواحی روستایی در راستای توسعه آنها است که نتیجه آن به برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه منطقه‌ای-ملی منجر خواهد شد. از این رو، هدف این پژوهش بررسی عملکرد نهادها و سازمان‌های مرتبط در پایداری روستاها در راستای توسعه منطقه‌ای به‌صورت مطالعه موردی در بخش دهدز شهرستان ایذه می‌باشد. روش تحقیق ازنظر ماهیت، توصیفی-تحلیلی و ازنظر هدف کاربردی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق را ازنظر مکانی روستاهای بخش دهدز شهرستان ایذه و ازنظر جمعیتی، افراد ساکن در این روستاها تشکیل می‌دهند. مجموع افراد این روستاها،</strong><strong>13161 </strong><strong>نفر بوده که با توجه به حجم جامعه آماری و عدم دسترسی به‌تمامی آنها، بر اساس فرمول کوکران نمونه آماری مناسب به تعداد 315 نفر انتخاب و داده‌ها از طریق پرسش‌نامه در سطح روستاها و افراد جمع‌آوری شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که عملکرد نهادها و سازمان‌ها ازنظر اقتصادی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی، زیست‌محیطی و کالبدی-فیزیکی در پایداری روستاها با سطح معناداری کمتر از 005/0، مناسب و در سطح متوسطی می‌باشد. تحلیل ناپارامتری همبستگی نیز نشان‌دهنده وجود رابطه مستقیم و معنی‌داری در سطح آلفای01/0 میان شاخص اقتصادی با شاخص‌های موردبررسی است؛ به‌گونه‌ای که با بهبود عملکرد نهادها و سازمان‌ها در هرکدام از شاخص‌های توسعه، دیگر شاخصها بهبود و زمینه پایداری روستاها فراهم می‌شود.</strong></p> <div style="text-align: justify; "><strong><span class="fontstyle0">Introduction</span></strong></div> <div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="fontstyle1">One of the necessary principles of rural development is its management. A special approach of </span>development is needed to be planned for every particular area. On the other hand, it is not useful to apply an integrated approach of development by new managing systems. At this point we can clearly understand the important role of institutions and organizations related to the structuralfunctional development of villages. These institutions and organizations have critical roles in different economic, social, cultural, and eco-environmental aspects of a society. Those tasks defined for some of these institutions and organizations are a combination of different aspects or a single task oriented which can affect rural planning and its development. Management aspects of institutions and organizations related to rural development are among the most important factors here. Although, compared to previous years, considerable changes have occurred in rural management systems but they couldn’t cause rural sustainability. In this regard, structuralfunctioning performance of organizations and institutions related to the current status of villages was highly decisive. So, regarding rural position with the great impact of its development on local national progress, it seems necessary to investigate the performance of the institutions and organizations in different economic, social, cultural, eco-environmental, and structural aspects of villages. This research aims at evaluating the performance of institutions and organizations related to rural sustainability to find ways to the regional development of Dehdez district in the County of Izeh.</div> <div style="text-align: justify; "><strong><span class="fontstyle0">Methodology</span></strong></div> <div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="fontstyle1">This is an applied research conducted by descriptive-analytical approach. Required data was </span>collected through document-library and field studies. Data required for field studies were collected through questionnaires. Among all the residential villages of the area which are over 101, a number of 30 villages (25% of all villages) have been randomly selected as questioning samples. Based on Cochran formula 315 households were selected as statistical samples. Sample population has been distributed among 30 villages using the ratio method proportional to population. Finally, data have been collected and analyzed in SPSS and AMOS software. One- sample t test and correlation analysis methods were used in inferential statistics.</div> <div style="text-align: justify; "><strong><span class="fontstyle0">Discussion and conclusion</span></strong><br> <span class="fontstyle2">Regional and integrated developments are the consequences of good programming of acceptable performances of rural institutions and organizations. People believe that, compared to the past 30 years, these institutions and organizations have been acted successfully in terms of economic, social, structural, and eco-environmental aspects. Additionally, they have caused positive changes in programming and fighting against poverty. The most remarkable thing in terms of changes happened is the matter of time requirements and factors affecting this field of study. In other words, in every period of time the existing factors and facilities have influenced on the performance of related organizations and institutions. Another important point is that in spite of spatial inequalities in the provision of services and facilities to the rural areas, relative satisfaction with the performance of such institution and organizations is still visible.<br> Although the performance of these organizations has been acceptable in four different aspects, their weaknesses cannot be ignored. In fact, if these organizations could make changes in rural development, they couldn’t cause rural sustainability and unsustainability is still continuing there. It can be said that even after the establishment and extra interfering of institutions in rural management, not only have not these human settlements become sustainable, but also several economic, social, and eco-environmental changes have been imposed on them.<br> Therefore, in spite of the fact that this research is intending to show the effectiveness of rural institutions on the improvement of rural position, it should be mentioned that it is a moderate impact appropriate to the time requirements which is mostly concentrated on services with no effective impact on rural sustainability. So, integrated objectives and systemic perspectives should be taken by managers and programmers and decision making should be done within the same framework. According to the results from the study, in line with the improvement of organizational and institutional performances in the studied area and other generalized regions, a few suggestions are presented:<br> 1. Organizational and institutional emphasis on an integrated systematic rural development and sustainability by paying more attention to all the variables mentioned in the study.<br> 2. More emphasis of related authorities and institutions on economic development of rural areas considering results from the study that shows some deficiencies in terms of income, employment, variety of activities, and ….<br> 3. According to the better functions of rural institutions and organizations in social dimension of villages and the inseparable connection of economic and social dimensions, the existing capacity of social variables should be used for the improvement and promotion of economic sector.<br> 4. Based on the results from the study it can be implied that the lack of suitable institutional interaction in different dimensions of rural development is one of the deficiencies and weaknesses in terms of rural sustainability. On the other hand, each institution and organization is trying for its own goals and it cannot lead to the comprehensive and sustainable rural development. So, it is suggested to increase this type of interactions and try to establish a new organization responsible for rural development.</span></div> عملکرد, نهادها و سازمان‌ها, پایداری, روستا, توسعه منطقه‌ای, شهرستان ایذه. Performance, Institutions and Organizations, Sustainability, Village, Regional Development, Izeh County. 119 140 http://serd.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-40&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Hojat Allah Sadeghi حجت اله صادقی h_sgeo@yahoo.com 10031947532846001859 10031947532846001859 Yes عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ایذه، ایران. Skandar Seidaiy اسکندر صیدائی 10031947532846001860 10031947532846001860 No Associate Professor of Geography and rural planning, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran دانشیار و عضو هیئت ‌علمی گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. Shadi Ghobadi شادی قبادی 10031947532846001861 10031947532846001861 No M.A. of Geography and rural planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران. Maryam Salehi Kakhki مریم صالحی 10031947532846001862 10031947532846001862 No Ph.D. Student of Geography and Rural Planning, Islamic Azad of University, Mashhad, Iran. دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی کارآفرینی فضای روستایی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران.