<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>SPACE ECONOMY &amp; RURAL DEVELOPMENT</title>
<title_fa>اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی</title_fa>
<short_title>serd</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-2131</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2588-476X</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/serd</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>4444</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1394</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2016</year>
	<month>2</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>4</volume>
<number>14</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>تحلیل فضایی توسعه نواحی مرزی شرق کشور مورد: دهستان های مرزی استان خراسان جنوبی </title_fa>
	<title>Spatial Analysis of Development of Boarder Regions in East Iran Case Study: Border villages in South Khorasan Province</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p dir=&quot;RTL&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;سازمان فضایی یا ساماندهی همگن توسعه&amp;shy;ی فضا، یکی از دغدغه&amp;shy;های بنیادی سیاست&amp;shy;مداران و برنامه&amp;shy;ریزان در مقیاس&amp;shy;های گوناگون ملی، منطقه&amp;shy;&amp;shy;ای و فرامنطقه&amp;shy;ای است. برنامه&amp;shy;ریزی، ارتباط و جریان&amp;shy;های میان سکونتگاه&amp;shy;ها به&amp;shy;ویژه در مناطق مرزی، نیاز به سازماندهی فضایی را برای نواحی روستایی به&amp;shy;وجود می&amp;shy;آورد تا مسائل کلان و ملی، همچون موضوعات امنیتی را بتوان دقیق&amp;shy;تر و کارآمدتر سامان&amp;shy;دهی کرد. با توجه به چنین اهمیتی، پژوهش پیش روی، کوشیده است تا سطح توسعه&amp;shy;ی فضایی دهستان&amp;shy;های مرزی استان خراسان جنوبی را مطالعه کند. در پژوهش پیش رو،&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 23 شاخص از شاخص&amp;shy;های توسعه&amp;shy;ی فضایی واکاوی شده است. پژوهش، از لحاظ روشی علی- مقایسه&amp;shy;ای است و با بهره&amp;shy;گیری از روش شباهت به گزینه&amp;shy;ی ایده&amp;shy;آل (تاپسیس) و روش آنتروپی به بررسی آمایشی 11 دهستان از مجموع دهستان&amp;shy;های مرزی استان خراسان جنوبی پرداخته است.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;نتایج این پژوهش، نشان از آن دارد که دهستان &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;مود&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;، در بالاترین سطح برخورداری نسبت به دیگر دهستان&amp;shy;های مورد مطالعه قرار دارد. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;از لحاظ توسعه&amp;shy;ی شاخص&amp;shy;های &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;اقتصادی- اجتماعی، آموزشی- فرهنگی&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;، &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;بهداشتی- درمانی&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; و &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;شاخص&amp;shy;های زیربنایی، 6 دهستان شامل درح، مومن آباد، میغان، بندان، شوسف و گزیک بعنوان دهستان&amp;shy;های نیمه برخوردار و چهار دهستان به ترتیب شامل قهستان، میاندشت، نهارنجان و عرب&amp;shy;خانه به&amp;shy;عنوان دهستان&amp;shy;های محروم شناسایی شدند. از این رو، به نظر می&amp;shy;رسد که سازمان فضایی در میان دهستان&amp;shy;های مرزی استان خراسان جنوبی، به شدت نامتوازن و نامتجانس است.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p dir=&quot;RTL&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Introduction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;When unbalanced spatial dispersion of developmental indicators increase, unbalanced distribution&amp;nbsp;of facilities and population will dramatically increase too and meanwhile the increase of&amp;nbsp;centralization of indicators in regions that suffer from centralization of facilities and population will&amp;nbsp;lead to population and facilities movement from deprived regions and this will increase unbalanced&amp;nbsp;spatial-geographical dispersion. So, achieving sustainable development of human force is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;impossible. For achieving sustainable development as the ultimate goal of planning, the first step is&amp;nbsp;studying and recognizing the current situation and the level of distribution of facilities in regions as&amp;nbsp;a starting point for achieving development. Planning which its goal is sustainable development in&amp;nbsp;settlements especially in border regions, needs spatial organization in rural regions to organize&amp;nbsp;macro and national issues including national security issues more precisely and more efficiently.&amp;nbsp;Therefore, in this study compatibility or incompatibility in spatial dispersion of development pattern&amp;nbsp;in South Khorasan villages are evaluated and classified regarding some indicators such as&amp;nbsp;infrastructure, social-economic, education and culture, and health. According to the results of this&amp;nbsp;study, it seems that spatial organization in border counties and villages located in South Khorasan is&amp;nbsp;extremely unbalanced and incompatible.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Methodology&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;Regarding its methodology, this study is a cause and effect-comparative one and regarding its&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;nature it is a practical study. 23 indicators have been chosen out of developmental indicators which&amp;nbsp;include socioeconomic, educational-cultural, health and infrastructural ones. Data were collected&amp;nbsp;through documentary research using documents of government offices in 1392, in four cities which&amp;nbsp;are located in South Khorasan border (Nehbandadn, Darmiyan, Zirkuh and Sarbisheh). Statistical&amp;nbsp;population includes villages located in border counties in South Khorasan province and the study&amp;nbsp;samples regarding statistical population have been determined 11 villages according to the&amp;nbsp;separation of political boundaries in villages. To classify border villages of this province according&amp;nbsp;to the level of getting facilities according to the studied indicators, TOPSIS approach and Shannon&amp;nbsp;Entropy Coefficient have been used to determine the weight coefficient of each of the indicators.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Discussion and Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;In recent years, planners and politicians are interested in studying the unbalanced spatial dispersion&amp;nbsp;in different geographical areas and the existence of unbalanced conditions in different dimensions is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;an important sign of undeveloped regions. This study tries to reveal the importance of getting more&amp;nbsp;of economic indicators through a critical realism point of view by answering to this question that&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;how border rural districts of South Khorasan province are related to their socioeconomic context as&amp;nbsp;an organization?&amp;rdquo; It seems that by evaluating spatial condition, it is possible to achieve to a total&amp;nbsp;indicator of security status; therefore it is expected that security status will not be in a good&amp;nbsp;condition when a region gets less of economic indicators. The study result showed that Mood rural&amp;nbsp;district have the best condition in evaluating socioeconomic, educational-cultural, health and&amp;nbsp;infrastructural indicators and as a result in final classification this rural district is the only district&amp;nbsp;among border rural districts in South Khorsan province which gets the most facilities. Studies show&amp;nbsp;that rural districts, Mood, Doroh, MomenAbad, Mighan and Shusf are respectively in the first to&amp;nbsp;fifth grade, regarding balanced spatial development pattern. In this classification, four rural districts,&amp;nbsp;Ghohestan, Miyandasht, Naharenjan, Arabkhane are deprived rural districts respectively. On the&amp;nbsp;whole, in South Khorasan province among 11 rural districts as study samples, regarding socialeconomic, educational-cultural, health and infrastructural indicators, 6 rural districts including&amp;nbsp;Doroh, MomenAbad, Mighan, Bandan, Shusf ans Gezik are recognized as rural districts that get&amp;nbsp;less facilities and four of them including Ghohestan, Miyandashtn Naharenjan and Arabkhane are&amp;nbsp;recognized as deprived rural districts respectively.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Mood rural district is the only case that encompasses all of this study indicators, however this&amp;nbsp;region is not in a desirable situation and its numerical distance from developmental indicators is&amp;nbsp;almost a lot. Such pattern shows the incompatible and unbalanced characteristic of spatial&amp;nbsp;construction in border counties of South Khorasan province.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>توسعه, امنیت پایدار, سازمان فضا, دهستان های مرزی خراسان جنوبی.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Development, Sustainable Security, Space Organization, Border Villages of South Khorasan.</keyword>
	<start_page>147</start_page>
	<end_page>167</end_page>
	<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-21&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Afshin</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mottaghi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>افشین</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>متقی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>afshin_mottaghi@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846001807</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001807</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Assistant Professor of the Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>استادیار دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Hossein</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Rabiei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>حسین</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>ربیعی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846001808</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001808</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Assistant Professor of the Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>استادیار دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mosayeb</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>GharehBeygi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>مصیب</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>قره بیگی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846001809</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001809</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>MA Student of Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
