دوره 14، شماره 27 - ( 6-1403 )                   جلد 14 شماره 27 صفحات 156-134 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print


1- کارشناسی ارشد رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. ، naseromid68@gmail.com
2- استادیار گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3- استاد گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکده تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده:   (3412 مشاهده)
هدف پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر کانون توجه شنیداری با بار بالا و پایین شناختی بر عملکرد ورزشی و حافظه کاری نوجوانان بود. پژوهش نیمه‌تجربی و شامل دانش­آموزان نوجوان دوره ابتدایی و متوسطه اول شهر کوهنانی بودند. نمونه آماری، 20 دانش آموز 13-11 ساله بود. در پیش­آزمون، از ضربه چیپ فوتبال استفاده شد. مرحله اکتساب در 4 روز متوالی اجرا شد. در مراحل یادداری تاخیری و انتقال، آزمون  ان-بک و ضربه چیپ فوتبال اجرا شد. نتایج نشان داد؛ در گروه کانون توجه شنیداری با بار بالای شناختی، اثر کانون توجه شنیداری با بار بالای شناختی بر عملکرد ورزشی و حافظه­کاری معنادار بوده (01/0p) و گروه کانون توجه شنیداری با بار پایین شناختی، فقط در حافظه­کاری بهبود را نشان داد (01/0p). بنابراین دستکاری بار­ شناختی بر حافظه­کاری و عملکرد ورزشی تأثیر مثبت دارد.
متن کامل [PDF 2357 kb]   (149 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: رفتار حرکتی
دریافت: 1402/5/1 | پذیرش: 1403/1/23 | انتشار الکترونیک پیش از انتشار نهایی: 1403/1/23 | انتشار: 1403/6/10

فهرست منابع
1. Williams, M. L. The Effect of Focus of Attention on Error Detection Ability. Journal of Research in Music Education. 2022; 69(4), 473-485. doi: 10.1177/0022429421997449 [DOI:10.1177/0022429421997449]
2. Chaudhuri, S., Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M. K. Teachers' focus of attention in first-grade classrooms: exploring teachers experiencing less and more stress using mobile eye-tracking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2021. 1-17.3. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2021.1958374 [DOI:10.1080/00313831.2021.1958374]
3. Kattner, F., & Ellermeier, W. Distraction at the cocktail party: Attenuation of the irrelevant speech effect after a training of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2020, 46(1), 10. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000695 [DOI:10.1037/xhp0000695]
4. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1973. DOI:10.2307/1421603 [DOI:10.2307/1421603]
5. Beatty J, Wagoner BL. Pupillometric signs of brain activation vary with level of cognitive processing. Science. 1978 ;199(4334):1216-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.628837 [DOI:10.1126/science.628837]
6. Khosravi S, Bigdeli I, Mazaheri M. Interaction between visual attention and visual working memory: retro - cue benefit in recognition information. JCP. 2017; 5 (3) :1-10. (in persian). Doi: 20.1001.1.23455780.1396.5.3.5.3
7. Schaffert N, Janzen TB, Mattes K, Thaut MH. A review on the relationship between sound and movement in sports and rehabilitation. Front Psycho. 2019;10:244. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00244 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00244]
8. Sussman ES. Auditory scene analysis: An attention perspective. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(10):2989-3000. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0041 [DOI:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0041]
9. Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. Psychol learn motiv. 1974 (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 [DOI:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1]
10. Jonikaitis D, Moore T. The interdependence of attention, working memory and gaze control: behavior and neural circuitry. Curr opin in psycho. 2019;29:126-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.012 [DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.012]
11. Kraus N, Strait D, Parbery-Clark A. Cognitive factors shape brain networks for auditory skills: spotlight on auditory working memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1252(1):100. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06463.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06463.x]
12. Heinrich A, Schneider BA, Craik FI. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008;61(5):735-51. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701402372 [DOI:10.1080/17470210701402372]
13. Strait DL, Hornickel J, Kraus N. Subcortical processing of speech regularities underlies reading and music aptitude in children. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7(1):1-1. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-7-44 [DOI:10.1186/1744-9081-7-44]
14. Berti S, Schröger E. Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. Eur J of Neurosci. 2014;17(5):1119-22. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02527.x [DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02527.x]
15. Muller-Gass A, Schröger E. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain Res. 2007;1136(1):169-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.020 [DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.020]
16. Dalton P, Lavie N, Spence C. Short article: The role of working memory in tactile selective attention. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009;62(4):635-44. DOI: 10.1080/17470210802483503 [DOI:10.1080/17470210802483503]
17. Bagheri F, Mohammadi S, Maleki M, Master Thesis The effect of load on the accuracy and timing of athletes and non-athletes of Kurdistan University, The University of Kordestan, 2013. (in persian)
18. Barcelos N, Shah N, Cohen K, Hogan MJ, Mulkerrin E, Arciero PJ, Cohen BD, Kramer AF, Anderson-Hanley C. Aerobic and Cognitive Exercise (ACE) Pilot Study for Older Adults: Executive Function Improves with Cognitive Challenge While Exergaming. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015; 21(10):768-79. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617715001083 [DOI:10.1017/S1355617715001083]
19. Makaruk H, Porter JM, Bodasińska A, Palmer S. Optimizing the penalty kick under external focus of attention and autonomy support instructions. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;20(10):1378-1386. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1720829 [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2020.1720829]
20. Wulf G ,Attentional Focus Effects in Balance Acrobats. Res Q for Exerc Sport, (2008) 79:3, 319-325. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599495 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599495]
21. McNicholas K, Comyns TM. Attentional Focus and the Effect on Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(7):1860-1866. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003610 [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003610]
22. Wulf, G., & McNevin, N. H. Simply distracting learners is not enough: More evidence for the learning benefits of an external focus of attention. Eur J Sport Sci, 2003;34(7):1860-1866. DOI:10.1080/17461390300073501 [DOI:10.1080/17461390300073501]
23. .Aghdaei M, Aslankhani M, Farokhi A, Abdoli B, The effect of the instruction of different distances of external focus, internal focus and self-attention on the acquisition, reminder and transfer of badminton long service, Sports Psychology, 2010; 2(1): -. (in persian).
24. aghdaei, M., farsi, A., khalaji, M. Investigating Running economy in beginners: The role of associative and dissociative attentional focus with internal and external dimensions. Motor Behavior. 2021; 13(43), 101-122. (in persian). DOI:10.22089/MBJ.2019.6630.1734
25. Hamedi S, Abdoli B, Farsi A. The Effect of Metacognitive Strategies and Observation of Skilled Model on Soccer Chip Task Learning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2018 1;6(1). (in persian). Doi: 20.1001.1.23455780.1397.6.1.4.5
26. Hamedi S, Bahram A, Shirzad E, Kazemnejad A, The effect of bandwidth modeling on the learning of performance outcome in Soccer chip task, Journal of Research in motor behavior, 2013; 1(1): 11-22. (in persian)
27. Fayazi L, Rafiee M, Zandi B, The Relationship among Sidedness, Communicative Function and Age in Autistic Students, Journal of Exceptional Education, 2014; 14(125): 31-40. (in persian)
28. Heydari M, Aghdaei M, Farsi A, Master Thesis The effect of exercise-induced induction of behavioral brain systems on cognitive effort and motor memory performance. Facutly of physical education and sport science, Shahid Beheshti University. 2019. (in Persian).
29. Zolfi V, Rezaei A,The Effect of Working Memory Computer Assisted Intervention on Mathematics Anxiety, Working Memory and Performanceing Mathematics among Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 2015; 8(30): 75-86. (in persian).
30. Hosseinpour S, Behpour N, Tadibi V, Ramezankhani A, Effect of Cognitive-motor Exercises on Physical Health and Cognitive Status in Elderly, Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, 2018; 5(4): 336-344. (in persian). Doi: 10.30699/acadpub.ijhehp.5.4.336 [DOI:10.30699/acadpub.ijhehp.5.4.336]
31. Azim Zadeh E, Faghihi V, Ghasemi A, The effect of dual-task training on balance of elderly women: with the motor and cognitive approach, Journal of Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior, 2018; 8(15): 103-110. (in persian). Doi: 10.29252/JRSM.8.15.103 [DOI:10.29252/JRSM.8.15.103]
32. Khajavi D, Khalaji H, Rajaian H, Master Thesis The effect of balance training in dual task conditions with sensory manipulation on the balance of the elderly, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Arak University, 2016. (in persian)
33. Maclean LM, Brown LJE, Khadra H, Astell AJ. Observing prioritization effects on cognition and gait: The effect of increased cognitive load on cognitively healthy older adults' dual-task performance. Gait Posture. 2017;53:139-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.01.018 [DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.01.018]
34. Naeimikia M, Izanloo Z, Gholami A, ahar S. The Effect Task Training with Increased cognitive load on the Traits of related to Balance in Elderly Males. jgn. 2018; 4 (3). (in persian).
35. Nazemzadegan, G., Bagherzadeh, F., Hemayattalab, R., farsi, A. The Comparison of the Effect of Cognitive Load on Duration and Accuracy of Bimanual Coordination Task. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement, 2010; 2(1): 133-149. (in persian)
36. Si Sakhti M, Batoli A, Sachdef P, The effect of cognitive load on the activity of brain areas involved in long-term memory retrieval using functional magnetic resonance imaging, Research Institute of Cognitive Sciences, 2020, 2(1): 110-128. (in persian). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.700146 [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2021.700146]
37. Hassanzadeh F, Golmohammadi B, Memar Moghadam M,, Master Thesis The effect of a training course with external focus instructions on the balance and verbal memory of the blind, Semnan University, 2019. (in persian)
38. Kavyani M ,Ebrahimi R. The effect of cognitive empowerment On working memory and observational learning of a motor skill in children, Development & Motor Learning, 2020, 12(40), 219-236. Doi:10.22059/jmlm.2020.298811.1493
39. Oyen AS, Bebko JM. The Effects of Computer Games and Lesson Contexts on Children's Mnemonic Strategies. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996;62(2):173-89. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0027 [DOI:10.1006/jecp.1996.0027]
40. Lambourne K. The relationship between working memory capacity and physical activity rates in young adults. J Sports Sci Med. 2006 1;5(1):149-53.
41. Mirakhori, F., Arabameri, E., Bagherzadeh, F., Hemayattalab, R. Effect of attentional focus instructions on spatial memory in children. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement, 2020; 12(1): 15-30. (in persian). doi:10.22059/jmlm.2020.213074.1133
42. Ghalamzan Sh, Malekpour M, Faramarzi S, The effectiveness of attention games on the level of executive functions and attention of preschool children with learning neuropsychological-developmental disabilities, jornal of research and health, 2014 ;62(2):173-89. (in persian)
43. Zeyni, M., Khasar, E., Baloochi, M., motabd, N. The effectiveness attention games to improvement memory performance and visual learning approach based on the neurological primary school in children. Educational Psychology, 2018; 14(48): 1-17. (in persian). doi: 10.22054/jep.2018.13512.1482
44. Radfar F, Nejati V, Fathababdi J, Layegh H, Effect of Attention Training on Working Memory Function and Reading Components in Pupils with Dyslexia: A Single-subject Design Study, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2016; 26(142): 194-212. (in Persian)

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.