Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Geotextile

Dr Mahmood Reza Abdi, Mr Mahdi Safdari Seh Gonbad,
Volume 12, Issue 5 (5-2019)
Abstract

One of the methods of increasing soil resistance against failure is soil reinforcement using geosynthetics. Soil-geosynthetic interactions are of great importance and are affected by friction and adhesion at their interface. Soil gradation, contact surface roughness and geotextile density are among the factors affecting soil-geotextiles interaction this study, to investigate the effects of these factors, large-scale direct shear tests have been conducted using a well and a poorly graded sand at a relative density of 80% reinforced with two geotextiles having different tensile strengths and mass per unit area. Samples were subjected to normal pressures of 12.5, 25 and 50kPa and sheared at a rate of 1 mm/min. Geotextile surface roughness was achieved by gluing two different single sized sand particles. Results show that increasing geotextile surface roughness increases shear strength at soil-geotextile interface. Geotextile tensile strength mobilization is shown to depend on soil grain size at the interface. The coarser and more angular the soil particles, the more effective the soil-reinforcement interactions. Geotextile tensile strength and its mass per unit area are shown to less important factors.

Ehsan Amjadi Sardehaei, Gholamhosein Tavakoli Mehrjardi,
Volume 13, Issue 5 (2-2020)
Abstract

This paper presents a feed-forward back-propagation neural network model to predict the retained tensile strength and design chart to estimate the strength reduction factors of nonwoven geotextiles due to the installation process. A database of 34 full-scale field tests was utilized to train, validate and test the developed neural network and regression model. The results show that the predicted retained tensile strength using the trained neural network is in good agreement with the results of the test. The predictions obtained from the neural network are much better than the regression model as the maximum percentage of error for training data is less than 0.87% and 18.92%, for neural network and regression model, respectively. Based on the developed neural network, a design chart has been established. As a whole, installation damage reduction factors of the geotextile increases in the aftermath of the compaction process under lower as-received grab tensile strength, higher imposed stress over the geotextiles, larger particle size of the backfill, higher relative density of the backfill and weaker subgrades.

 


Semaneh Ghasemvash, Rouzbeh Dabir,
Volume 14, Issue 3 (11-2020)
Abstract

Introduction
Pavement layers as a part of road structure play an important role and provide a flat and secure surface. Subgrade layer could act as a compacted embankment, natural or stabilized ground. Subgrade is a foundation of pavement layers, and it withstands all of loads due to vehicles that are transferred from upper layers (i.e., subbase, base and asphalt layers).Therefore, constructing pavements with bearing capability, high durability, quality, and maintenance in proper operating conditions is very important. However, suitable materials for constructing pavement layers are not available, and improvement techniques should be employed for them. Generally, different methods such as mechanical or chemical are available for improvement. Nowadays, geosynthetic materials such as geotextile and geogrid are used to optimize and enhance the bearing capacity of pavement layers. The present study is aimed to investigate the effects of geotextile applications on bearing capacity of clay-gravel mixtures in pavement layers.
Material and Methods
In this research, materials were prepared from Barandouz area. Clayey soil was mixed with gravel in 25, 50 and 75 percentages (by weight). Geotextile was woven and made of polypropylene (with commercial name Fibertex-F-32). Geotextile effects in mixture were evaluated in two conditions. Position number one indicates the arrangement of geotextile.  This means, at first, one geotextile layer was embedded in the middle of materials. Then, two and three geotextile layers in equal depths from each other were used in soil mixtures. Position number two shows the mixing pieces randomly. This means that geotextile pieces in 1×1 and 5×5 cm2 were prepared and were randomly mixed with materials in 1, 2 and 3 percentages (by weight). For evaluating geotechnical behavior of improved clay-gravel mixtures, compaction and California bearing ratio test (CBR) (in dry and saturate conditions) based on ASTM were performed.        
It should be noted CBR test in dry and saturate conditions were carried out in three different compaction energies (i.e. 10, 25 and 56 blow count for per layer). Moreover, CBR was evaluated for piston penetration at 2.5 and 5 cm in the specimen.
Results and discussion
The findings of this study could be summarized as:
1. Results of compaction test showed that, in the unimproved position, with increasing gravel content in clay, maximum dry unit weight (γdmax) has been increased, while simultaneous optimum water content (wopt) decreased.
In the improved position, in the first mode, when a geotextile layer was embedded in the middle of the specimens, γdmax reached to its upper value, whereas wopt reached to its minimum value. On the other hand, with an increase in the number of geotextile layers in clay-gravel mixtures, dry density has been decreased, but optimum water content increased. Furthermore, in the second mode, when geotextile pieces with 1×1 and 5×5 cm2 were randomly mixed in the specimens, the findings revealed that geotextile pieces with 1 cm2 areas and 1% by weight in clay-gravel mixtures increases γdmax and reduces wopt.
2. In dry and saturate conditions, California bearing ratio (CBR) test result displayed that in the unimproved condition, with an increase in gravel content in the clay, CBR value has been increased. In the improved situation, in the first mode, when a geotextile layer was embedded in the samples, CBR had a maximum value in all of the compaction energies even though it is reduced as the number of layers increased. In the second mode, when geotextile pieces in 1×1 cm dimensions with 1% (by weight) were randomly mixed with the specimens, CBR value reached at high.  In contrast, with increasing dimensions of pieces and percentages in the presence of geotextile in clay-gravel mixtures, CBR values declined.  Therefore, it can be concluded that, according to Code 234 (Iran Highway Asphalt Paving Code), the application of one geotextile sheet in the middle of materials or geotextile pieces in 1×1 cm dimensions with 1% (by weight) random mixing  is suitable for subbase and base layers in pavement design.
3. CBR test results in the saturate condition in clay-gravel mixtures illustrated that, in the non-reinforced condition, with an increase in clay content in specimens, swelling value keeps rising sharply. On the contrary, in the reinforced position with embedding a geotextile layer in the middle sector of samples or through adding geotextile pieces (1 cm2) with 1 % content  (by weight) to the specimens, the rate of swelling significantly decreased.   
Conclusion
To sum up, the main objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of geotextile applications on bearing capacity of clay-gravel mixtures in pavement layers. The findings demonstrated that when geotextile as a layer was embedded in the middle part of specimens or as pieces with 1×1 cm dimensions and 1% content (by weight) was randomly mixed with the mid materials, the bearing capacity of the reinforced specimens was enhanced.  In contrast, in the saturate condition, swelling potential significantly was reduced. It is noteworthy to mention that 1 cm2 pieces of geotextile is more effective than the layers. This is due to the fact these pieces make aggregates closer to each other. Thereby, minimum void ratio (emin) reaches its least value, the structure of grading improves, and the contacts between particles and geotextile pieces rise. As a suggestion for further research, it looks promising to evaluate the dynamic properties and the behavior of the improved materials with other geosyntheticses.
 
Mr. Seyed Ali Ghaffari, Prof. Amir Hamidi, Dr. Gholamhossein Tavakoli Mehrjardi,
Volume 14, Issue 5 (1-2021)
Abstract

This paper investigates response of triangular shell strip footings situated on the sandy slope. A series of reduced-scale plate load tests were conducted to cover different parameters including three shell footing types with different apex angles in addition to a flat footing, four different distances for strip footings from the crest of the slope namely “edge distance” and reinforcement status (unreinforced and geotextile-reinforced statuses). Bearing capacity of shell footings adjacent to crest of the slope, bearing capacity ratio, shell efficiency factor, influence of apex angle on settlement of footings and the mechanism of slope failure are discussed and evaluated. Also, empirical equations for determination of the maximum bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings are suggested. As a whole, it has been observed that decrease of shell’s apex angle as good as increase of edge distance could significantly improve the bearing capacity. However, as the edge distance increases, the effect of apex angle on the bearing capacity got decreased. Also, it was found out that the beneficial effect of reinforcement on the bearing capacity decreased with increase of the edge distance. Furthermore, the efficiency of shell footings on bearing capacity was attenuated in reinforced slopes compared to the unreinforced status.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Engineering Geology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb